<p>(A) Aftereffects induced with the fundamental frequency adaptor (f0<sub>A</sub>/formant<sub>AB</sub>). Right panel: statistical analysis, differences between each adaptation condition and baseline (i.e., no adaptation). Shaded area: 95% confidence interval. (B) Aftereffects induced with the formant adaptor (f0<sub>AB</sub>/formant<sub>A</sub>). Right panel: statistical analysis, differences between each adaptation condition and baseline (i.e., no adaptation). Shaded area: 95% confidence interval.</p
<p>The horizontal error is plotted against the sequence of trials. The upper and lower panels show t...
Adaptation to distorted faces is commonly interpreted as a shift in the face-space norm for the adap...
<p>The error bars denote 95% within-subject confidence intervals. The squares indicate the simulated...
<p>A. The responses of adapter and the neighboring frequencies in a single site, in control (black l...
<p>A. The frequency response area for average of 167 neurons in A1 area, which shows a decrease in t...
<p>A, Tuning curve of one site and five proper frequencies that selected around the charactristic fr...
<p>Error bars show +/1 S.E.M. <b>Bottom Panel</b>: Mean difference in the percentage of straight ahe...
<p>A 3×2 repeated measured ANOVA with mask condition (no mask, monoptic mask, or dichoptic mask) and...
<p>Error bars show +/1 S.E.M. <b><i>Bottom Panel</i></b>: Mean difference in the percentage of direc...
<p>A. The LFP variation in control sequence (black bar) and adapting sequences (gray bar) for a reco...
<p>Here we plotted the population-averaged adaptation leak conductance g<sub>a</sub> preceding the B...
<p>A. Example of a unit whose gain did not adapt. A1. Tuning curve computed from spikes evoked durin...
<p>The magnitude of the aftereffect as a function of test tones in the variable test frequency condi...
<p>Results of main experiment. Each row shows results for a different observer. The data points are ...
<p><i>A,B</i>. Comparison of the average of LFP voltage variations and spike count distributions of ...
<p>The horizontal error is plotted against the sequence of trials. The upper and lower panels show t...
Adaptation to distorted faces is commonly interpreted as a shift in the face-space norm for the adap...
<p>The error bars denote 95% within-subject confidence intervals. The squares indicate the simulated...
<p>A. The responses of adapter and the neighboring frequencies in a single site, in control (black l...
<p>A. The frequency response area for average of 167 neurons in A1 area, which shows a decrease in t...
<p>A, Tuning curve of one site and five proper frequencies that selected around the charactristic fr...
<p>Error bars show +/1 S.E.M. <b>Bottom Panel</b>: Mean difference in the percentage of straight ahe...
<p>A 3×2 repeated measured ANOVA with mask condition (no mask, monoptic mask, or dichoptic mask) and...
<p>Error bars show +/1 S.E.M. <b><i>Bottom Panel</i></b>: Mean difference in the percentage of direc...
<p>A. The LFP variation in control sequence (black bar) and adapting sequences (gray bar) for a reco...
<p>Here we plotted the population-averaged adaptation leak conductance g<sub>a</sub> preceding the B...
<p>A. Example of a unit whose gain did not adapt. A1. Tuning curve computed from spikes evoked durin...
<p>The magnitude of the aftereffect as a function of test tones in the variable test frequency condi...
<p>Results of main experiment. Each row shows results for a different observer. The data points are ...
<p><i>A,B</i>. Comparison of the average of LFP voltage variations and spike count distributions of ...
<p>The horizontal error is plotted against the sequence of trials. The upper and lower panels show t...
Adaptation to distorted faces is commonly interpreted as a shift in the face-space norm for the adap...
<p>The error bars denote 95% within-subject confidence intervals. The squares indicate the simulated...