<p>Panel A depicts an increase 100–400 ms after S1 onset (dashed squares) before vs. after training, averaged across the sensor cluster defined in 2B. B: Sensor cluster showing significant CE training effect on gamma power increase defined by cluster-based permutation analysis.</p
This dataset contains the raw EEG data collected in a study investigating the neural signatures of e...
<p>TF plots A and B are based on autoregressive modeling (AR), C and D on Morlet wavelet analysis. T...
<p>Indicated is the number of channels involved at each time-frequency point. Black box indicates wi...
<p>Panel A depicts a decrease around S2 (300–800 ms after S1, dashed rectangles) before vs. after tr...
<p>Panel A illustrates significant cluster of MEG sensors (p<sub>cluster</sub><0.05) obtained after ...
<p>(a) Time-frequency analysis of the total power difference between elevated gamma band and non-ele...
<p>(a) Training success: Representation of the average change of gamma band activity (30–45 Hz) in e...
<p>Cluster averaged power is plotted with standard deviation. Notably lower frequency band activatio...
<p><b>A</b> Time-frequency plot showing the results of cluster permutation statistics (p-values) on ...
<p>(a) Percent change of gamma and alpha band activity in the selected ROI in the LOC in the gamma a...
<p>Panel <b>A</b> illustrates significant cluster of MEG sensors (p<sub>cluster</sub><0.01) obtained...
<p>A) Instantaneous frequencies (1/ISI) were plotted from 200 ms before the gamma burst to 300 ms af...
<p><b>A</b> and <b>B</b>, The group-mean ERSP plots show power differences (in dB) referenced to a 3...
Fig A. Time-frequency power spectrum plot. Illustrates, at group level, the power spectrum for Preci...
<p>Information starts flowing after stimulus onset when, consequently, TE starts rising. The plot sh...
This dataset contains the raw EEG data collected in a study investigating the neural signatures of e...
<p>TF plots A and B are based on autoregressive modeling (AR), C and D on Morlet wavelet analysis. T...
<p>Indicated is the number of channels involved at each time-frequency point. Black box indicates wi...
<p>Panel A depicts a decrease around S2 (300–800 ms after S1, dashed rectangles) before vs. after tr...
<p>Panel A illustrates significant cluster of MEG sensors (p<sub>cluster</sub><0.05) obtained after ...
<p>(a) Time-frequency analysis of the total power difference between elevated gamma band and non-ele...
<p>(a) Training success: Representation of the average change of gamma band activity (30–45 Hz) in e...
<p>Cluster averaged power is plotted with standard deviation. Notably lower frequency band activatio...
<p><b>A</b> Time-frequency plot showing the results of cluster permutation statistics (p-values) on ...
<p>(a) Percent change of gamma and alpha band activity in the selected ROI in the LOC in the gamma a...
<p>Panel <b>A</b> illustrates significant cluster of MEG sensors (p<sub>cluster</sub><0.01) obtained...
<p>A) Instantaneous frequencies (1/ISI) were plotted from 200 ms before the gamma burst to 300 ms af...
<p><b>A</b> and <b>B</b>, The group-mean ERSP plots show power differences (in dB) referenced to a 3...
Fig A. Time-frequency power spectrum plot. Illustrates, at group level, the power spectrum for Preci...
<p>Information starts flowing after stimulus onset when, consequently, TE starts rising. The plot sh...
This dataset contains the raw EEG data collected in a study investigating the neural signatures of e...
<p>TF plots A and B are based on autoregressive modeling (AR), C and D on Morlet wavelet analysis. T...
<p>Indicated is the number of channels involved at each time-frequency point. Black box indicates wi...