<p>Regions that showed significant between-group differences in nodal betweenness mapped on ICBM152 surface template. Hot color identifies the regions that have significantly higher nodal betweenness in CON compared to ALL while cold color identifies regions with significantly higher nodal betweenness in ALL compared to CON. The regional differences were quantified based on AUC analysis in the density range of 0.22∶0.01∶0.45.</p
<p>Constructed networks and corresponding hubs for ALL (top) and CON (middle) groups. Nodes that are...
<p>The comparison was done for each region, centrality metric and threshold. Values in each cell sho...
<p>The networks are depicted at different values of threshold <i>θ</i>. A) 0.005; B) 0.01; C) 0.02; ...
<p>The 95% confidence intervals and between-group differences in normalized clustering (top), normal...
<p>The below graph shows the comparison (red bar for younger group and blue bar for older group) of ...
<p>This table lists the hub regions () in the network of older group. Regions in bold show increased...
<p>First row: NC versus AD, second row: NC versus MCI, third row: MCI versus AD. The sign of the sta...
<p>The yellow-red on the brain masks (the right half of the figure) labels the regions with higher r...
<p>This table lists the hub regions () in the network of younger group. Regions in bold show decreas...
<p>(A) Differences between the HC and PM groups in subjects' structural networks. The black solid po...
<p>This table shows regions with changes in normalized betweenness () between two groups. Normalized...
<p>The blue color represented the higher values of regional nodal centralities in healthy controls, ...
<p>The lower panel shows the differences in the nodal global parameter (), and the upper panel shows...
<p>Each row corresponds to a rhythm, and from top to bottom, they are beta and gamma, respectively; ...
<p>Regions showing significantly different functional connectivity within attention-related brain ne...
<p>Constructed networks and corresponding hubs for ALL (top) and CON (middle) groups. Nodes that are...
<p>The comparison was done for each region, centrality metric and threshold. Values in each cell sho...
<p>The networks are depicted at different values of threshold <i>θ</i>. A) 0.005; B) 0.01; C) 0.02; ...
<p>The 95% confidence intervals and between-group differences in normalized clustering (top), normal...
<p>The below graph shows the comparison (red bar for younger group and blue bar for older group) of ...
<p>This table lists the hub regions () in the network of older group. Regions in bold show increased...
<p>First row: NC versus AD, second row: NC versus MCI, third row: MCI versus AD. The sign of the sta...
<p>The yellow-red on the brain masks (the right half of the figure) labels the regions with higher r...
<p>This table lists the hub regions () in the network of younger group. Regions in bold show decreas...
<p>(A) Differences between the HC and PM groups in subjects' structural networks. The black solid po...
<p>This table shows regions with changes in normalized betweenness () between two groups. Normalized...
<p>The blue color represented the higher values of regional nodal centralities in healthy controls, ...
<p>The lower panel shows the differences in the nodal global parameter (), and the upper panel shows...
<p>Each row corresponds to a rhythm, and from top to bottom, they are beta and gamma, respectively; ...
<p>Regions showing significantly different functional connectivity within attention-related brain ne...
<p>Constructed networks and corresponding hubs for ALL (top) and CON (middle) groups. Nodes that are...
<p>The comparison was done for each region, centrality metric and threshold. Values in each cell sho...
<p>The networks are depicted at different values of threshold <i>θ</i>. A) 0.005; B) 0.01; C) 0.02; ...