<p>The character count does not include spaces. Stroop effect data reported here are from the lower-case letter condition after reading. Stroop RT is the difference in reaction times (ms) of incongruent and congruent trials. Stroop % is the difference in accuracy between congruent and incongruent trials. The number of times a participant read each letter is equal to the character count per participant multiplied by the relative letter frequency. Estimated relative letter frequencies are: ‘e’ = 12.07%, ‘t’ = 9.06%, ‘a’ = 8.17%, ‘s’ = 6.33%.</p
Skilled readers demonstrate remarkable efficiency in processing written words, unlike beginning read...
Skilled readers demonstrate remarkable efficiency in processing written words, unlike beginning read...
The presence of the Stroop effect betrays the fact that the carrier words were read in the face of i...
<p>Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (<i>N</i> = 15). (A) Reaction times on congruent a...
• Neutral trials were used to measure the display frequency effect • All features had equal marginal...
<p>This Figure shows confidence intervals (p = .05) of the Congruency effects (as the respective dif...
<p>Pane lA illustrates the mean RT as a function of congruency (C, I). It indicates a significant St...
The purpose of this experiment was to test the relationship between grade level and the Stroop effec...
<p>Estimated mean Stroop effect (average difference between response latencies in incongruent and co...
In a Stroop task, participants can be presented with a color name printed in color and need to class...
identify the ink colors of color words (for a review, see MacLeod, 1991). Responses are typically sl...
grantor: University of TorontoBesner, Stolz, and Boutillier (1997) claimed to have elimina...
<p>(A) Means and SD of baseline to post-assessment difference values of participants`reaction times ...
We studied a group of 24 children with dyslexia in second to fifth primary school grades by using a ...
<p>A. Mean RTs and error rates for congruent and incongruent Stroop items with standard error bars. ...
Skilled readers demonstrate remarkable efficiency in processing written words, unlike beginning read...
Skilled readers demonstrate remarkable efficiency in processing written words, unlike beginning read...
The presence of the Stroop effect betrays the fact that the carrier words were read in the face of i...
<p>Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (<i>N</i> = 15). (A) Reaction times on congruent a...
• Neutral trials were used to measure the display frequency effect • All features had equal marginal...
<p>This Figure shows confidence intervals (p = .05) of the Congruency effects (as the respective dif...
<p>Pane lA illustrates the mean RT as a function of congruency (C, I). It indicates a significant St...
The purpose of this experiment was to test the relationship between grade level and the Stroop effec...
<p>Estimated mean Stroop effect (average difference between response latencies in incongruent and co...
In a Stroop task, participants can be presented with a color name printed in color and need to class...
identify the ink colors of color words (for a review, see MacLeod, 1991). Responses are typically sl...
grantor: University of TorontoBesner, Stolz, and Boutillier (1997) claimed to have elimina...
<p>(A) Means and SD of baseline to post-assessment difference values of participants`reaction times ...
We studied a group of 24 children with dyslexia in second to fifth primary school grades by using a ...
<p>A. Mean RTs and error rates for congruent and incongruent Stroop items with standard error bars. ...
Skilled readers demonstrate remarkable efficiency in processing written words, unlike beginning read...
Skilled readers demonstrate remarkable efficiency in processing written words, unlike beginning read...
The presence of the Stroop effect betrays the fact that the carrier words were read in the face of i...