<p>Greater exploration associated with improved performance, across different sets of trials.</p
<p>* Significant difference from Pre (p < 0.05).</p><p>§ Significant “group x time” interaction (p <...
<p>The relative improvement in performance time was significantly different between groups and it wa...
<p>GO terms obtained most improvement on predictive performance by FFPred-fly+.</p
<p>Greater exploration associated with improved performance, across different participants.</p
<p>Performance time in three trials and improvements with respect to trials with a leading cue.</p
The performance of the feature sets selected for the causal discovery experiments.</p
<p>The replication efficiencies obtained for different data sets used in the study.</p
<p>Regions where activity to experimental task hits was greater than the implicit baseline.</p
<p>Performance comparison and relative gain of the proposed scheme over the existing schemes.</p
Performance comparison of a species-specific predictor using the test dataset.</p
Mean (SD) improvement in time to complete the star tracing task across trials on land and in water.<...
<p>Enumeration of performance enhancement at different levels of coarse-graining as compared to rand...
Correlations among exploration/persistence, working memory, and grit measures.</p
Delayed choices per individual across conditions for test trials only (high-quality reward in delaye...
<p>Performance comparison of the second experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).<...
<p>* Significant difference from Pre (p < 0.05).</p><p>§ Significant “group x time” interaction (p <...
<p>The relative improvement in performance time was significantly different between groups and it wa...
<p>GO terms obtained most improvement on predictive performance by FFPred-fly+.</p
<p>Greater exploration associated with improved performance, across different participants.</p
<p>Performance time in three trials and improvements with respect to trials with a leading cue.</p
The performance of the feature sets selected for the causal discovery experiments.</p
<p>The replication efficiencies obtained for different data sets used in the study.</p
<p>Regions where activity to experimental task hits was greater than the implicit baseline.</p
<p>Performance comparison and relative gain of the proposed scheme over the existing schemes.</p
Performance comparison of a species-specific predictor using the test dataset.</p
Mean (SD) improvement in time to complete the star tracing task across trials on land and in water.<...
<p>Enumeration of performance enhancement at different levels of coarse-graining as compared to rand...
Correlations among exploration/persistence, working memory, and grit measures.</p
Delayed choices per individual across conditions for test trials only (high-quality reward in delaye...
<p>Performance comparison of the second experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).<...
<p>* Significant difference from Pre (p < 0.05).</p><p>§ Significant “group x time” interaction (p <...
<p>The relative improvement in performance time was significantly different between groups and it wa...
<p>GO terms obtained most improvement on predictive performance by FFPred-fly+.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG