<p>Participants were required to detect target letters within digit distractors. SOA was either 30 msec or 90 msec. The location of T1 was jittered between serial positions 4, 5 and 6. T2 appeared at lag 1, 2 or 6. Every trial contained at least two targets. If a third target appeared, it was positioned directly after T2. Targets are underlined in this table for ease of detection. Targets were not underlined in the actual task.</p
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>The two target digits (T1 and T2) were embedded within a stream of distractor letters. Lag was ma...
Participants searched for four red target letters in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP). On eac...
<p>Participants were required to detect target letters within digit distractors. SOA was either 30 m...
<p>A. Main effect of target-distractor similarity on “target present” trials for HIT (left) and MISS...
<p>The benefit of letter detection inside the target for HIT trials was already significant for a 50...
<p>Each trial began with presentation of a central fixation cross, for a fixed 1 s (a/b) or a variab...
<p>(<b>a, b</b>) Stimulus locations. The stimulus image was presented randomly at 33 possible locati...
Participants searched for four red target letters in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP). On eac...
Three experiments explored the gradual narrowing of visual attention to a letter target when other l...
<p>Target stimuli were identical to Experiment 1. Distractors were either (A) mosaic-scrambled faces...
<p>Paired <i>t</i>-tests comparisons showed that when the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) is short (...
<p>a.) Without noise, small stimulus set size; b.) Without noise, large stimulus set size; c.) Noise...
<p>The proportions are not drawn to scale. After the fixation cross, the cue was shown for a varying...
<p>A: Participants searched a matrix for the designated digit shown on the left side of each matrix ...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>The two target digits (T1 and T2) were embedded within a stream of distractor letters. Lag was ma...
Participants searched for four red target letters in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP). On eac...
<p>Participants were required to detect target letters within digit distractors. SOA was either 30 m...
<p>A. Main effect of target-distractor similarity on “target present” trials for HIT (left) and MISS...
<p>The benefit of letter detection inside the target for HIT trials was already significant for a 50...
<p>Each trial began with presentation of a central fixation cross, for a fixed 1 s (a/b) or a variab...
<p>(<b>a, b</b>) Stimulus locations. The stimulus image was presented randomly at 33 possible locati...
Participants searched for four red target letters in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP). On eac...
Three experiments explored the gradual narrowing of visual attention to a letter target when other l...
<p>Target stimuli were identical to Experiment 1. Distractors were either (A) mosaic-scrambled faces...
<p>Paired <i>t</i>-tests comparisons showed that when the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) is short (...
<p>a.) Without noise, small stimulus set size; b.) Without noise, large stimulus set size; c.) Noise...
<p>The proportions are not drawn to scale. After the fixation cross, the cue was shown for a varying...
<p>A: Participants searched a matrix for the designated digit shown on the left side of each matrix ...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>The two target digits (T1 and T2) were embedded within a stream of distractor letters. Lag was ma...
Participants searched for four red target letters in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP). On eac...
DOI
Add to ORKG