<p>Mean response bias (<i>ß</i>) across the test and training blocks for the anodal (2 mA) and sham (0.1 mA) stimulation groups.</p
<p>Upper panels: speed group, lower panels: accuracy group. Left panels: feature negative stimuli an...
<p>Performance improvements relative to the first training block for the anodal tDCS session (black ...
<p>Mean FA, RD and AD (± SD) across all voxels that survived thresholding for the comparison between...
<p>Mean perceptual sensitivity (<i>d′</i>) in the pre-training baseline, immediate post-training ret...
<p>Mean hit rate in the pre-training baseline, immediate post-training retention test, and 24-hour r...
<p>Mean percentage of falsely identified threats on non-threat trials (false alarm rate) across the ...
<p>Mean and standard deviation for sensitivity and response bias in each experimental condition.</p>...
<p>Mean false alarm rate in the pre-training baseline, immediate post-training retention test, and 2...
<p>Box plots representing the RT HIT, FA rate and efficiency index in anodal and sham stimulation (a...
<p>Mean accuracy (A) and reaction time (B) as a function of response bias condition. (C). Fitted DDM...
<p>(<b>A</b>, <b>B</b>) The performance quantified by the (baseline-subtracted) force field compensa...
<p>Although participants tended to make “pick” responses on about two-thirds of trials in the first ...
<p>The PRE and D1 values are represented. <sup>*</sup> indicates significant differences between PRE...
<p><b>(A)</b> Pre-test (empty symbols) and post-test (full symbols) thresholds on the speech discrim...
<p>Learning is shown as the difference between pre- and post-test thresholds. Individual z-scores we...
<p>Upper panels: speed group, lower panels: accuracy group. Left panels: feature negative stimuli an...
<p>Performance improvements relative to the first training block for the anodal tDCS session (black ...
<p>Mean FA, RD and AD (± SD) across all voxels that survived thresholding for the comparison between...
<p>Mean perceptual sensitivity (<i>d′</i>) in the pre-training baseline, immediate post-training ret...
<p>Mean hit rate in the pre-training baseline, immediate post-training retention test, and 24-hour r...
<p>Mean percentage of falsely identified threats on non-threat trials (false alarm rate) across the ...
<p>Mean and standard deviation for sensitivity and response bias in each experimental condition.</p>...
<p>Mean false alarm rate in the pre-training baseline, immediate post-training retention test, and 2...
<p>Box plots representing the RT HIT, FA rate and efficiency index in anodal and sham stimulation (a...
<p>Mean accuracy (A) and reaction time (B) as a function of response bias condition. (C). Fitted DDM...
<p>(<b>A</b>, <b>B</b>) The performance quantified by the (baseline-subtracted) force field compensa...
<p>Although participants tended to make “pick” responses on about two-thirds of trials in the first ...
<p>The PRE and D1 values are represented. <sup>*</sup> indicates significant differences between PRE...
<p><b>(A)</b> Pre-test (empty symbols) and post-test (full symbols) thresholds on the speech discrim...
<p>Learning is shown as the difference between pre- and post-test thresholds. Individual z-scores we...
<p>Upper panels: speed group, lower panels: accuracy group. Left panels: feature negative stimuli an...
<p>Performance improvements relative to the first training block for the anodal tDCS session (black ...
<p>Mean FA, RD and AD (± SD) across all voxels that survived thresholding for the comparison between...
DOI
Add to ORKG