<p>Values represent mean latencies of gaze-allocation in invalid minus valid trials. The gaze-imitation effect is significant in both conditions and significantly stronger in the threat condition. Error-bars represent SEM. * = p<.05. ** = p<.01. *** = p<.001.</p
We examined the utility of a gaze cueing paradigm to examine sensitivity to differences among negati...
<p>Mean startle amplitudes in microvolts during the last trial of acquisition, the first extinction ...
<p>SRTs for leftward, rightward, and forward gaze direction conditions for neutral and fearful expre...
<p>Depicted error bars represent standard errors of the mean adjusted to within-participants design....
<p>Depicted error bars represent corrected standard errors of the mean adjusted to within-participan...
<p>Significant interaction effect between: Prime condition, SOA and Face (<i>F</i>(1,44) = 4.36, <i>...
<p>Mean latencies (with standard deviation) of gaze-allocation for each condition in the gaze-imitat...
<p><i>Note.</i> SEM = Standard Error of the Mean,</p>*<p><i>p</i><.05, N = 45.</p
The gaze of a fearful face silently signals a potential threat’s location, while the happy-gaze comm...
The gaze of a fearful face silently signals a potential threat's location, while the happy-gaze comm...
<p>a) Grand mean maps of the mean amplitude of ERF in response to targets between 55 and 70 ms, unde...
<p>The resulting gaze cueing effect (RT difference between invalid and valid trials) is indicated in...
The gaze of a fearful face silently signals a potential threat's location, while the happy-gaze comm...
<p>Error bars represent the confidence intervals (95% CIs) adapted for within-participants designs a...
<p>Error bars represent the confidence intervals (95% CIs) adapted for within-participants designs a...
We examined the utility of a gaze cueing paradigm to examine sensitivity to differences among negati...
<p>Mean startle amplitudes in microvolts during the last trial of acquisition, the first extinction ...
<p>SRTs for leftward, rightward, and forward gaze direction conditions for neutral and fearful expre...
<p>Depicted error bars represent standard errors of the mean adjusted to within-participants design....
<p>Depicted error bars represent corrected standard errors of the mean adjusted to within-participan...
<p>Significant interaction effect between: Prime condition, SOA and Face (<i>F</i>(1,44) = 4.36, <i>...
<p>Mean latencies (with standard deviation) of gaze-allocation for each condition in the gaze-imitat...
<p><i>Note.</i> SEM = Standard Error of the Mean,</p>*<p><i>p</i><.05, N = 45.</p
The gaze of a fearful face silently signals a potential threat’s location, while the happy-gaze comm...
The gaze of a fearful face silently signals a potential threat's location, while the happy-gaze comm...
<p>a) Grand mean maps of the mean amplitude of ERF in response to targets between 55 and 70 ms, unde...
<p>The resulting gaze cueing effect (RT difference between invalid and valid trials) is indicated in...
The gaze of a fearful face silently signals a potential threat's location, while the happy-gaze comm...
<p>Error bars represent the confidence intervals (95% CIs) adapted for within-participants designs a...
<p>Error bars represent the confidence intervals (95% CIs) adapted for within-participants designs a...
We examined the utility of a gaze cueing paradigm to examine sensitivity to differences among negati...
<p>Mean startle amplitudes in microvolts during the last trial of acquisition, the first extinction ...
<p>SRTs for leftward, rightward, and forward gaze direction conditions for neutral and fearful expre...
DOI
Add to ORKG