<p>Comparison of analysis by stimuli: effects of pre-evaluation exposure frequency (F0, F2, F10) on liking in Experiment 1 (left) and in Experiment 2 (right) in the category stone.</p
Previous investigations have provided evidence for positive (“mere exposure”), negative, and inverte...
<p>Comparison of the proportion of trials in which either similar validity cue was selected by numbe...
<p>The bars on the left represent the difference between pleasantness ratings before and just after ...
<p>Analysis by participants: effects of pre-evaluation exposure frequency (F0, F2, F10) on liking sp...
<p>Spearman Correlation of GEMS and Description Preferences (Embodied vs. GEMS) for First Experiment...
<p>Relative Frequency of Positive, Negative, and No Opinion Shifts Observed in Study 2 after the Fir...
While many studies have shown that exposure frequency affects consumer attitudes and preferences, th...
<p>Mean Liking Ratings and Cousineau-Morey Difference Adjusted 95% Confidence Intervals for the Four...
Three experiments examined changes in liking and memory for music as a function of number of previou...
Experiments 1 and 2: Proportion (frequency) of choosing across showups and overall.</p
Stimulus discriminability is often assessed by comparisons of two successive stimuli: a fixed standa...
In an attempt to resolve disagreements about the events underlying repeated exposure to a stimulus a...
<p><i>Note</i>: Post-hoc assignment to groups of relative low and high art-expertise groups was even...
the larger sizes. This shift in the rating scale is greater when there are either fewer categories (...
<p>Experiment 2: Mean proportions of comparison stimuli that were judged to be stiffer than the stan...
Previous investigations have provided evidence for positive (“mere exposure”), negative, and inverte...
<p>Comparison of the proportion of trials in which either similar validity cue was selected by numbe...
<p>The bars on the left represent the difference between pleasantness ratings before and just after ...
<p>Analysis by participants: effects of pre-evaluation exposure frequency (F0, F2, F10) on liking sp...
<p>Spearman Correlation of GEMS and Description Preferences (Embodied vs. GEMS) for First Experiment...
<p>Relative Frequency of Positive, Negative, and No Opinion Shifts Observed in Study 2 after the Fir...
While many studies have shown that exposure frequency affects consumer attitudes and preferences, th...
<p>Mean Liking Ratings and Cousineau-Morey Difference Adjusted 95% Confidence Intervals for the Four...
Three experiments examined changes in liking and memory for music as a function of number of previou...
Experiments 1 and 2: Proportion (frequency) of choosing across showups and overall.</p
Stimulus discriminability is often assessed by comparisons of two successive stimuli: a fixed standa...
In an attempt to resolve disagreements about the events underlying repeated exposure to a stimulus a...
<p><i>Note</i>: Post-hoc assignment to groups of relative low and high art-expertise groups was even...
the larger sizes. This shift in the rating scale is greater when there are either fewer categories (...
<p>Experiment 2: Mean proportions of comparison stimuli that were judged to be stiffer than the stan...
Previous investigations have provided evidence for positive (“mere exposure”), negative, and inverte...
<p>Comparison of the proportion of trials in which either similar validity cue was selected by numbe...
<p>The bars on the left represent the difference between pleasantness ratings before and just after ...
DOI
Add to ORKG