<p>(a) 67% ranges elicited from assessors A–D for additive internal biases, with means and 67% ranges for total internal bias; (b) 67% ranges elicited from assessors E–H for proportional external biases, with means and 67% ranges for total external bias.</p
<p>Two studies were identified as being of a higher design quality. Three studies were identified as...
<p>Summary of risk of bias judgements presented as percentages across all included studies.</p
(A): Risk of bias graph indicating the review authors’ rating regarding the risk of bias, presented ...
<p>Impact of adjusting initially for internal bias and subsequently for both internal and external b...
‘Risk of bias’ graph: Review authors’ assessments for each risk of bias item presented as percentage...
<p>Funnel plots provided graphic estimate of bias for overall studies (A), OS studies (B) and DFS st...
[EN] Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the agreement and compare the performance of th...
<p>(A) Risk-of-bias summary: the authors’ judgments about each risk-of-bias item for the each includ...
<p>Risk of bias graph: the authors’ judgments about each risk-of-bias item presented as percentages ...
The first two items assess study quality by scoring reporting, a “yes” score indicates reported and ...
<p>Each risk of bias item is presented as the percentage across all the included studies, which indi...
<p>(B) Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each includ...
Risk of bias graph: Review authors’ judgments about each risk of bias item presented as percentages ...
<p>Risk of bias graph: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percenta...
<p>(A) Review judgments of authors on each methodological quality item presented as percentages acro...
<p>Two studies were identified as being of a higher design quality. Three studies were identified as...
<p>Summary of risk of bias judgements presented as percentages across all included studies.</p
(A): Risk of bias graph indicating the review authors’ rating regarding the risk of bias, presented ...
<p>Impact of adjusting initially for internal bias and subsequently for both internal and external b...
‘Risk of bias’ graph: Review authors’ assessments for each risk of bias item presented as percentage...
<p>Funnel plots provided graphic estimate of bias for overall studies (A), OS studies (B) and DFS st...
[EN] Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the agreement and compare the performance of th...
<p>(A) Risk-of-bias summary: the authors’ judgments about each risk-of-bias item for the each includ...
<p>Risk of bias graph: the authors’ judgments about each risk-of-bias item presented as percentages ...
The first two items assess study quality by scoring reporting, a “yes” score indicates reported and ...
<p>Each risk of bias item is presented as the percentage across all the included studies, which indi...
<p>(B) Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each includ...
Risk of bias graph: Review authors’ judgments about each risk of bias item presented as percentages ...
<p>Risk of bias graph: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percenta...
<p>(A) Review judgments of authors on each methodological quality item presented as percentages acro...
<p>Two studies were identified as being of a higher design quality. Three studies were identified as...
<p>Summary of risk of bias judgements presented as percentages across all included studies.</p
(A): Risk of bias graph indicating the review authors’ rating regarding the risk of bias, presented ...