<p>Dominant females = DF, dominant males = DM, subordinate females = SF, and subordinate males = SM. Within individual status, there was no difference between sexes (DF-DM, p = 0.12; SF-SM, p = 0.20). Within individual sex, there was a significant effect of dominance for females (DF-SF, p = 0.027, effect size = 0.207) but not males (DM-SM, p = 0.94) – dominant females produced fewer fast-rate chuck calls than subordinate females. Analysed using the package “languageR” and the function ‘pvals.fnc’ (uses Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations; <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0025010#pone.0025010-Baayen1" target="_blank">[37]</a>).</p
International audienceA growing body of literature deals with the influence of physical or social en...
<p>The x-axis shows the difference between the assumed and true mean peak frequency of male calls. G...
Conditions are grouped based on the forced relative phase angle to improve visual representation. Se...
<p>The difference between male and female simulated mean peak frequencies (Δ) was between 1 and 5 kH...
<p>Values for different sample sizes (cf. <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/j...
For each acoustic feature, a subsample of 1000 randomly selected vocal signals (500 male and 500 fem...
<p>a) mean call duration, b) mean pulse duration, c) mean IPI duration, d) mean F0 for the social ca...
Scatterplots showing bivariate correlations between dwell-times and RT-variability, for both males a...
<p><i>N</i> = 60 for both individuals and dyadic difference scores.</p>a<p>proportion of triad’s wor...
Despite ample evidence that females are weaker and possess smaller muscle cross-sectional areas (CSA...
Sex differences in CRT response time (in seconds) according to experimental conditions.</p
<p><b>(A)</b> Mean <i>RSP</i> curves for males and females during Solo2-concentrate condition. <b>(B...
<p>Bar graphs showing the percentage of copulations accompanied by calls, N = 75, given by seven fem...
<p>In this example, simulated mean peak frequencies of both sexes differed by 2 kHz and the number o...
<p>Same sd for both sexes, estimated via ABC across simulations (i.e. including all tested sample si...
International audienceA growing body of literature deals with the influence of physical or social en...
<p>The x-axis shows the difference between the assumed and true mean peak frequency of male calls. G...
Conditions are grouped based on the forced relative phase angle to improve visual representation. Se...
<p>The difference between male and female simulated mean peak frequencies (Δ) was between 1 and 5 kH...
<p>Values for different sample sizes (cf. <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/j...
For each acoustic feature, a subsample of 1000 randomly selected vocal signals (500 male and 500 fem...
<p>a) mean call duration, b) mean pulse duration, c) mean IPI duration, d) mean F0 for the social ca...
Scatterplots showing bivariate correlations between dwell-times and RT-variability, for both males a...
<p><i>N</i> = 60 for both individuals and dyadic difference scores.</p>a<p>proportion of triad’s wor...
Despite ample evidence that females are weaker and possess smaller muscle cross-sectional areas (CSA...
Sex differences in CRT response time (in seconds) according to experimental conditions.</p
<p><b>(A)</b> Mean <i>RSP</i> curves for males and females during Solo2-concentrate condition. <b>(B...
<p>Bar graphs showing the percentage of copulations accompanied by calls, N = 75, given by seven fem...
<p>In this example, simulated mean peak frequencies of both sexes differed by 2 kHz and the number o...
<p>Same sd for both sexes, estimated via ABC across simulations (i.e. including all tested sample si...
International audienceA growing body of literature deals with the influence of physical or social en...
<p>The x-axis shows the difference between the assumed and true mean peak frequency of male calls. G...
Conditions are grouped based on the forced relative phase angle to improve visual representation. Se...