<p>In the A-group, subjects (n = 12) performed one single session (400 trials) with a single offset side for 5 days. In the AB-group, subjects (n = 12) performed an additional training session B (400 trials) immediately after session A. The three-dot were identical except that the offset side in training session B was opposite to that presented in session A. For both these groups, the eye-tracker was employed with the gaze-contingent display. Note the offset side used in session A and B were counterbalanced across subjects for all experiments. The AB-gazefree group used the same paradigm as for the AB-group except that the eye-tracker was not employed.</p
<p>The sampling rate of our equipment (60 Hz) was not sufficient to resolve individual microsaccades...
<p>Pretest (blue) posttest (red). Subjects performed an additional training session B immediately af...
<p>If the efficiency of fixation differed between experimental conditions, and the pattern of differ...
<p>Pretest (blue) posttest (red). Without the use of eye-tracker, subjects showed significant improv...
The purpose of the first study was to operationalize eye-movement behavior during conditional discri...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic view of a trial progression during the eye-gaze contingent paradigm used in ...
<p>Single-target and free choice trials: After successful fixation, a 500 ms gap was followed by pre...
<p>Stimuli were 1.8×2.8 cm (3.4×5.3 deg visual angle). Faces were not covered in the experiment. Two...
<p>(A) Example of two consecutive trials in the no eye movements (NEM) and the eye movements (EM) co...
<p>The abscissa represents the three training groups (reading, saccade or healthy control). The ordi...
<p>Empirical proportion of capture by the distractor, averaged across participants, represents the p...
To what extent do humans exert control over low-level components of the oculomotor system? Previous ...
To what extent do humans exert control over low-level components of the oculomotor system? Previous ...
Contingency analyses of eye movements may reveal variables that are relevant to the stimulus control...
Contingency analyses of eye movements may reveal variables that are relevant to the stimulus control...
<p>The sampling rate of our equipment (60 Hz) was not sufficient to resolve individual microsaccades...
<p>Pretest (blue) posttest (red). Subjects performed an additional training session B immediately af...
<p>If the efficiency of fixation differed between experimental conditions, and the pattern of differ...
<p>Pretest (blue) posttest (red). Without the use of eye-tracker, subjects showed significant improv...
The purpose of the first study was to operationalize eye-movement behavior during conditional discri...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic view of a trial progression during the eye-gaze contingent paradigm used in ...
<p>Single-target and free choice trials: After successful fixation, a 500 ms gap was followed by pre...
<p>Stimuli were 1.8×2.8 cm (3.4×5.3 deg visual angle). Faces were not covered in the experiment. Two...
<p>(A) Example of two consecutive trials in the no eye movements (NEM) and the eye movements (EM) co...
<p>The abscissa represents the three training groups (reading, saccade or healthy control). The ordi...
<p>Empirical proportion of capture by the distractor, averaged across participants, represents the p...
To what extent do humans exert control over low-level components of the oculomotor system? Previous ...
To what extent do humans exert control over low-level components of the oculomotor system? Previous ...
Contingency analyses of eye movements may reveal variables that are relevant to the stimulus control...
Contingency analyses of eye movements may reveal variables that are relevant to the stimulus control...
<p>The sampling rate of our equipment (60 Hz) was not sufficient to resolve individual microsaccades...
<p>Pretest (blue) posttest (red). Subjects performed an additional training session B immediately af...
<p>If the efficiency of fixation differed between experimental conditions, and the pattern of differ...