<p>In both experiment, subjects (S) were placed in a cage where they could interact with an individual (I) in front of another cage where an audience (A) was present or not. In experiment 1 subjects could interact with a receptive female while in experiment 2, subjects were in a competition for food with another male. In both experiment, there were three conditions: a ‘no audience’ condition, b ‘familiar audience’ condition and c ‘mate audience’ condition. The order of conditions was balanced.</p
<p>Participants were told that they are playing against another young man, who was introduced prior ...
<p>Each block began with detailed instructions for the condition to be completed. Participants were ...
The existing literature acknowledges that a mismatch between the experimenter's and the subjects' mo...
<p>Offspring were kept in the adjacent aviaries with one adult male as song tutor centered between t...
<p>Mate-choice scores of males ( = time spent with the larger or smaller female/time spent with both...
<p>The cage arrangement for phase 2. The male subject was in the center cage, with the two females (...
<p>(a) Experimental condition: after seeing a majority of four performing an action, saw a fifth act...
The existing literature acknowledges that a mismatch between the experimenter’s and the subjects’ mo...
<p>(R = reward; E = experimenter; P = participant; dotted line = transparent barrier; central solid ...
<p>Experimental setup for Experiment 2 including the views of the participant of the virtual male ch...
<p>A given juvenile (J in white box) was exposed to the experimental subject (ES) during a 4-min sam...
<p>A cage was divided into two compartments using a cardboard wall that contained a small peephole. ...
<p>Experimental setup for Experiment 3 with respect to the participants’ viewpoints in the three dif...
In the free-choice condition, the agent was free to choose to deliver a shock or not (upper row). Th...
<p>In Panel A, the four experimental conditions of Experiment 2: participant uncrossed/co-experiment...
<p>Participants were told that they are playing against another young man, who was introduced prior ...
<p>Each block began with detailed instructions for the condition to be completed. Participants were ...
The existing literature acknowledges that a mismatch between the experimenter's and the subjects' mo...
<p>Offspring were kept in the adjacent aviaries with one adult male as song tutor centered between t...
<p>Mate-choice scores of males ( = time spent with the larger or smaller female/time spent with both...
<p>The cage arrangement for phase 2. The male subject was in the center cage, with the two females (...
<p>(a) Experimental condition: after seeing a majority of four performing an action, saw a fifth act...
The existing literature acknowledges that a mismatch between the experimenter’s and the subjects’ mo...
<p>(R = reward; E = experimenter; P = participant; dotted line = transparent barrier; central solid ...
<p>Experimental setup for Experiment 2 including the views of the participant of the virtual male ch...
<p>A given juvenile (J in white box) was exposed to the experimental subject (ES) during a 4-min sam...
<p>A cage was divided into two compartments using a cardboard wall that contained a small peephole. ...
<p>Experimental setup for Experiment 3 with respect to the participants’ viewpoints in the three dif...
In the free-choice condition, the agent was free to choose to deliver a shock or not (upper row). Th...
<p>In Panel A, the four experimental conditions of Experiment 2: participant uncrossed/co-experiment...
<p>Participants were told that they are playing against another young man, who was introduced prior ...
<p>Each block began with detailed instructions for the condition to be completed. Participants were ...
The existing literature acknowledges that a mismatch between the experimenter's and the subjects' mo...