<p>In the invisible condition, dynamic noise patches were presented to the dominant eye and faces with happy and sad emotional expressions were presented to the other eye. The duration of the face presentation was 800 ms for Experiments 1 and 3, and 200 ms for Experiment 2. After a 100-ms interval, participants were instructed to press one of two buttons as soon and accurate as possible to indicate the perceived orientation (clockwise or counter-clockwise) of a Gabor patch presented for 100 ms. In the visible condition, the dynamic noise patches were replaced by the same pair of faces presented to the other eye.</p
<p>Schematic illustration of the pattern of emotional stimuli used in the experiment. Four individua...
This series of experiments was designed to investigate ecological sequences of dynamic facial expres...
<p>We used adaptation in the dichoptic-mask condition (right-eye-dominance) as an example. Each tria...
<p>In Experiment 2, the noise patches were replaced by the same face picture presented to the other ...
<p>The suppressed face image was presented to one eye with its contrast gradually ramped up, and was...
<p><b>a</b>. Schematic of a single trial. Patches of noise were presented for 107 ms, creating an an...
<p>Stimuli were either fearful (F) or neutral (N) expression faces, pseudocolored in red, yellow,or ...
The face was presented on one of the four quadrants in one eye and the masks were presented for 100 ...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic view of a trial progression during the eye-gaze contingent paradigm used in ...
<p>Panel A. Trial sequence of Experiments 1–3. Participants were instructed to maintain fixation and...
<p>a) Illustration of the paradigm: Participants first saw a central fixation cross, followed by the...
<p>Two masked paired-faces were displayed for 16 ms as a prime. Participants were asked to decide wh...
<p>(A) Schematic representation of the paradigm used in the exposure phase of Experiments 1 and 2. T...
<p>(a) A trial comprised a display of binocular-rivalry gratings—in this case, a horizontal grating ...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Illustration of dichoptic stimulus presentation; (<b>b</b>) Illustration of two stimul...
<p>Schematic illustration of the pattern of emotional stimuli used in the experiment. Four individua...
This series of experiments was designed to investigate ecological sequences of dynamic facial expres...
<p>We used adaptation in the dichoptic-mask condition (right-eye-dominance) as an example. Each tria...
<p>In Experiment 2, the noise patches were replaced by the same face picture presented to the other ...
<p>The suppressed face image was presented to one eye with its contrast gradually ramped up, and was...
<p><b>a</b>. Schematic of a single trial. Patches of noise were presented for 107 ms, creating an an...
<p>Stimuli were either fearful (F) or neutral (N) expression faces, pseudocolored in red, yellow,or ...
The face was presented on one of the four quadrants in one eye and the masks were presented for 100 ...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic view of a trial progression during the eye-gaze contingent paradigm used in ...
<p>Panel A. Trial sequence of Experiments 1–3. Participants were instructed to maintain fixation and...
<p>a) Illustration of the paradigm: Participants first saw a central fixation cross, followed by the...
<p>Two masked paired-faces were displayed for 16 ms as a prime. Participants were asked to decide wh...
<p>(A) Schematic representation of the paradigm used in the exposure phase of Experiments 1 and 2. T...
<p>(a) A trial comprised a display of binocular-rivalry gratings—in this case, a horizontal grating ...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Illustration of dichoptic stimulus presentation; (<b>b</b>) Illustration of two stimul...
<p>Schematic illustration of the pattern of emotional stimuli used in the experiment. Four individua...
This series of experiments was designed to investigate ecological sequences of dynamic facial expres...
<p>We used adaptation in the dichoptic-mask condition (right-eye-dominance) as an example. Each tria...