<p>†Shade was a fixed factor with 3 levels; Urchin was fixed and orthogonal with 3 levels; Patch was a random factor nested in Shade×Urchin with 4 levels and Kelp was random and nested with 2 levels. The replicates were the quadrats (<i>n</i> = 5). Cochran's test was significant (<i>C</i> = 0.14 **). Transformation of data failed to make variances homogenous, so data were not transformed. **, <i>P</i><0.01; ns, <i>P</i>>0.05.</p
<p>Summary of two-way ANOVAs (applied to logit-transformed data) examining the effect of Waves (null...
<p><sup>+</sup>Trophic treatment levels: control, predator addition and resource addition.</p><p><su...
<p>Probability (<i>p</i>) values were calculated for treatment and treatment-time interaction effect...
<p>Mean (± S.E.; <i>n</i> = 8) percentage cover of bryozoans on kelps 1 month after experimental exc...
<p>Mean (± S.E.; <i>n</i> = 5) percentage cover of bryozoans on kelps 1 month after urchins were tra...
<p>The percent cover (mean±SE, n = 18) of invertebrates (A) during the experimental period (March 20...
<p>Panel a) details cover of canopy-forming algae, b) shows macroalgal species richness, and c) macr...
*<p>Treatment (Tr) was a fixed factor with 2 levels (caged <i>vs</i> uncaged); Macroalgae (Ma) was f...
<p>Data are mean+SE (<i>n</i> = 5). Data for Roscoff are not included because percentage covers were...
<p>Distance was fixed with 3 levels (inside, edge, 2.5 m), R <i>vs</i> Ref was fixed with 2 levels, ...
*<p>Macroalgae (Ma) was fixed with 2 levels (+/−); Treatment (Tr) was fixed and orthogonal with 5 le...
The effect of sea urchins on algae has often been studied when sea urchins forage over areas to crea...
*<p>Treatment (Tr) was fixed with 5 levels (3L, + macroalgae; 3L +10S, +/− macroalgae; 13L, +/− macr...
<p>Each data point in panels A to H is the average cover of <i>D. viridis</i> or urchin density in 1...
<p>Summary of two-way MANOVA (applied to logit-transformed data) examining the effect of Waves (null...
<p>Summary of two-way ANOVAs (applied to logit-transformed data) examining the effect of Waves (null...
<p><sup>+</sup>Trophic treatment levels: control, predator addition and resource addition.</p><p><su...
<p>Probability (<i>p</i>) values were calculated for treatment and treatment-time interaction effect...
<p>Mean (± S.E.; <i>n</i> = 8) percentage cover of bryozoans on kelps 1 month after experimental exc...
<p>Mean (± S.E.; <i>n</i> = 5) percentage cover of bryozoans on kelps 1 month after urchins were tra...
<p>The percent cover (mean±SE, n = 18) of invertebrates (A) during the experimental period (March 20...
<p>Panel a) details cover of canopy-forming algae, b) shows macroalgal species richness, and c) macr...
*<p>Treatment (Tr) was a fixed factor with 2 levels (caged <i>vs</i> uncaged); Macroalgae (Ma) was f...
<p>Data are mean+SE (<i>n</i> = 5). Data for Roscoff are not included because percentage covers were...
<p>Distance was fixed with 3 levels (inside, edge, 2.5 m), R <i>vs</i> Ref was fixed with 2 levels, ...
*<p>Macroalgae (Ma) was fixed with 2 levels (+/−); Treatment (Tr) was fixed and orthogonal with 5 le...
The effect of sea urchins on algae has often been studied when sea urchins forage over areas to crea...
*<p>Treatment (Tr) was fixed with 5 levels (3L, + macroalgae; 3L +10S, +/− macroalgae; 13L, +/− macr...
<p>Each data point in panels A to H is the average cover of <i>D. viridis</i> or urchin density in 1...
<p>Summary of two-way MANOVA (applied to logit-transformed data) examining the effect of Waves (null...
<p>Summary of two-way ANOVAs (applied to logit-transformed data) examining the effect of Waves (null...
<p><sup>+</sup>Trophic treatment levels: control, predator addition and resource addition.</p><p><su...
<p>Probability (<i>p</i>) values were calculated for treatment and treatment-time interaction effect...