<p>Tests “AUC<0.5 vs. AUC>0.5”, “AUC<0.7 vs. AUC>0.7”, “Likelihood ratio<1 vs. Likelihood ratio>1”, and “Likelihood ratio<1.5 vs. Likelihood ratio>1.5”.</p><p>***p<0.001 |</p><p>**p<0.01 |</p><p>*p<0.05 |. p<0.1 | NS not significant.</p
<p>Train set = average number of training data; Test set = average number of test data; Test omissio...
MSE, F-statistic and model significance of performance data when analysed by a one-way ANOVA and ANC...
<p>*Significant at the 0.05 level.</p><p>Estimates of the regression coefficients and corresponding ...
<p>CI: confidence interval</p><p>*p <0.001 for pathologic nodal staging score versus other models.</...
<p>For different cut-off values of the predicted risk, the prevalence of having an equal or higher r...
<p>Data are presented as mean ± SD. <i>p-values</i> were produced by independent sample t-test. <i>n...
In Monte Carlo experiment with simulated data, we show that as a point forecast criterion, the Clark...
MSE, F-statistic and model significance of performance data when analysed by a one-way ANOVA and ANC...
<p>Note: ΔAIC is the difference in AIC value between the top ranked model and the given model. Small...
* indicates statistical significance (“*” indicates p-value ns not statistically significant.</p
<p>The entries in cells indicate that the two systems are significantly different in F-scores. CD ha...
MSE, F-statistic and model significance of performance data when analysed by a one-way ANOVA and ANC...
MSE, F-statistic and model significance of performance data when analysed by a one-way ANOVA and ANC...
<p>The resulting c-statistics (AUC = 0.786) did not significantly differ from the training models’ A...
<p>A) Binomial Test. B) Student’s T-test. Both panels show the percentage of 1000 experiments with n...
<p>Train set = average number of training data; Test set = average number of test data; Test omissio...
MSE, F-statistic and model significance of performance data when analysed by a one-way ANOVA and ANC...
<p>*Significant at the 0.05 level.</p><p>Estimates of the regression coefficients and corresponding ...
<p>CI: confidence interval</p><p>*p <0.001 for pathologic nodal staging score versus other models.</...
<p>For different cut-off values of the predicted risk, the prevalence of having an equal or higher r...
<p>Data are presented as mean ± SD. <i>p-values</i> were produced by independent sample t-test. <i>n...
In Monte Carlo experiment with simulated data, we show that as a point forecast criterion, the Clark...
MSE, F-statistic and model significance of performance data when analysed by a one-way ANOVA and ANC...
<p>Note: ΔAIC is the difference in AIC value between the top ranked model and the given model. Small...
* indicates statistical significance (“*” indicates p-value ns not statistically significant.</p
<p>The entries in cells indicate that the two systems are significantly different in F-scores. CD ha...
MSE, F-statistic and model significance of performance data when analysed by a one-way ANOVA and ANC...
MSE, F-statistic and model significance of performance data when analysed by a one-way ANOVA and ANC...
<p>The resulting c-statistics (AUC = 0.786) did not significantly differ from the training models’ A...
<p>A) Binomial Test. B) Student’s T-test. Both panels show the percentage of 1000 experiments with n...
<p>Train set = average number of training data; Test set = average number of test data; Test omissio...
MSE, F-statistic and model significance of performance data when analysed by a one-way ANOVA and ANC...
<p>*Significant at the 0.05 level.</p><p>Estimates of the regression coefficients and corresponding ...
DOI
Add to ORKG