<p>Percentage of geographic units with statistically significant spatial clustering at each aggregation level.</p
<p>Percentage of landing positions as a function of face positions and regions of interest.</p
<p>Percentage of correctly classified sections by the automated approach in each subgroup.</p
<p>Numbers and percentages of clusters categorized by the raw coverage rates of improved sanitation,...
<p>Numbers and percentages of clusters categorized by the spatially-smoothed coverage rates of impro...
<p>Percentage of grids in sub-districts with z-scores in different resilience classes and average cl...
<p>Different counties in clusters detected using maximum spatial cluster sizes of 2% and 50%.</p
Percentage of individual sites in the 90th-percentile of potential brokerage scores [14] by geograph...
<p>Percentage change in agglomeration criterion (hierarchical cluster analysis using population adju...
<p>CI: confident interval;</p><p>Percentage was derived by the number of geographic units for each a...
<p>*Percentage of valid returned questionnaires to total number of questionnaires sent.</p><p>‡ Perc...
<p>CI: confident interval;</p><p>Percentage was derived by the number of geographic units for each r...
<p>CI: confident interval;</p><p>Percentage was derived by the number of geographic units for each e...
<p>Cluster distribution per country (numbers indicate percentages of members of each cluster of the ...
<p>Percentage of women who reported engaging in activities overall and by geographic area.</p
<p>CI: confident interval;</p><p>Percentage was derived by the number of geographic units for low in...
<p>Percentage of landing positions as a function of face positions and regions of interest.</p
<p>Percentage of correctly classified sections by the automated approach in each subgroup.</p
<p>Numbers and percentages of clusters categorized by the raw coverage rates of improved sanitation,...
<p>Numbers and percentages of clusters categorized by the spatially-smoothed coverage rates of impro...
<p>Percentage of grids in sub-districts with z-scores in different resilience classes and average cl...
<p>Different counties in clusters detected using maximum spatial cluster sizes of 2% and 50%.</p
Percentage of individual sites in the 90th-percentile of potential brokerage scores [14] by geograph...
<p>Percentage change in agglomeration criterion (hierarchical cluster analysis using population adju...
<p>CI: confident interval;</p><p>Percentage was derived by the number of geographic units for each a...
<p>*Percentage of valid returned questionnaires to total number of questionnaires sent.</p><p>‡ Perc...
<p>CI: confident interval;</p><p>Percentage was derived by the number of geographic units for each r...
<p>CI: confident interval;</p><p>Percentage was derived by the number of geographic units for each e...
<p>Cluster distribution per country (numbers indicate percentages of members of each cluster of the ...
<p>Percentage of women who reported engaging in activities overall and by geographic area.</p
<p>CI: confident interval;</p><p>Percentage was derived by the number of geographic units for low in...
<p>Percentage of landing positions as a function of face positions and regions of interest.</p
<p>Percentage of correctly classified sections by the automated approach in each subgroup.</p
<p>Numbers and percentages of clusters categorized by the raw coverage rates of improved sanitation,...
DOI
Add to ORKG