<p>Samples: Subject A–E, Day 1 and 2, LPS-stimulated sample (Stim) 1 and 2, amplification run (Amp) 1–3, and hybridisation (Hyb) 1–3. For each subject on each day there was also an unstimulated (Unstim) sample at 0 hours.</p
© Copyright 2015 by ASQ. In some designed experiments, measurements of characteristics of the experi...
Average looking times to trials consistent or inconsistent with familiarization (Trial Type, trials ...
<p>Twenty-four hours after complete transection, all subjects were given a first injection of either...
<p>Random-balanced experimental block design in one functional scan session. One session includes 4 ...
<p>Each session alternated between veridical and transformed batches of trials. Each subject partici...
<div><p>(A) Testing was divided into eight blocks of 100 trials with brief pauses between runs and a...
<p>Sampling pattern reflected our interest in the fourth 24-h period (day 4). Information from prece...
<p>All the subjects took place in the current study, were exposed to these four different tasks name...
<p>The fold changes for each sample are plotted against those for each of the other samples for gene...
<p>Both days of the stimulus-response task consisted of six trials. Data represent mean ± SEM of all...
<p>Individual rates of the amount of trials reached as valid regarding the fixation compliance (A); ...
<p>A. Comparison between the inter-trial variability and the predictive power. The inter-trial varia...
<p>a) Standard deviation of all genes for each variance component, showing median standard deviation...
<p>(A) Experimental timeline. The experiment contained two types of trial in which subjects chose be...
<p>The general trial design and timing was equivalent in all three Experiments (Exp. 1 – Exp. 3). Ex...
© Copyright 2015 by ASQ. In some designed experiments, measurements of characteristics of the experi...
Average looking times to trials consistent or inconsistent with familiarization (Trial Type, trials ...
<p>Twenty-four hours after complete transection, all subjects were given a first injection of either...
<p>Random-balanced experimental block design in one functional scan session. One session includes 4 ...
<p>Each session alternated between veridical and transformed batches of trials. Each subject partici...
<div><p>(A) Testing was divided into eight blocks of 100 trials with brief pauses between runs and a...
<p>Sampling pattern reflected our interest in the fourth 24-h period (day 4). Information from prece...
<p>All the subjects took place in the current study, were exposed to these four different tasks name...
<p>The fold changes for each sample are plotted against those for each of the other samples for gene...
<p>Both days of the stimulus-response task consisted of six trials. Data represent mean ± SEM of all...
<p>Individual rates of the amount of trials reached as valid regarding the fixation compliance (A); ...
<p>A. Comparison between the inter-trial variability and the predictive power. The inter-trial varia...
<p>a) Standard deviation of all genes for each variance component, showing median standard deviation...
<p>(A) Experimental timeline. The experiment contained two types of trial in which subjects chose be...
<p>The general trial design and timing was equivalent in all three Experiments (Exp. 1 – Exp. 3). Ex...
© Copyright 2015 by ASQ. In some designed experiments, measurements of characteristics of the experi...
Average looking times to trials consistent or inconsistent with familiarization (Trial Type, trials ...
<p>Twenty-four hours after complete transection, all subjects were given a first injection of either...
DOI
Add to ORKG