<p>The accuracy of <i>sumdiff/mul/sign-PAM for the top </i>% genes compared with the PAM accuracy for each of the nine datasets.</p
<p>The accuracy comparison of DFA7 and other three methods on 2000 mixed prokaryotic and eukaryotic ...
<p>Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for both the training dataset and the test ...
<p>The left and right panels show the accuracy using the gene expression level alone and both the SN...
<p>The accuracy of <i>sumdiff/mul/sign-</i>NB for the top % genes compared with the NB accuracy for ...
<p>The accuracy of <i>sumdiff/mul/sign-k-</i>NN for the top % genes compared with the <i>k-</i>NN ac...
<p>The accuracy of <i>sumdiff/mul/sign-</i>SVM for the top % genes compared with the SVM accuracy fo...
<p>Comparison of prediction accuracy on four multiclass classification datasets by varying the numbe...
<p>Comparison of prediction accuracy on four binary classification datasets by varying the number of...
<p>(a) Gene-profile accuracy as a function of . (b) Gene-profile accuracy for each time point.</p
<p>Noisy genes is the number of noisy genes in the synthetic data. RI, ARI and NMI reflect the perfo...
Top gene candidates subjected to statistical analyses have high accuracy as single-gene classifiers....
<p>Comparison of the adjacency accuracy between PMAG and its greedy version. The number of genomes i...
<p>Note: <i>p</i> value was computed with Wilcoxon rank sum test.</p><p>Comparison of expression div...
<p>Average RNA levels in wild type and the <i>top3-105</i> mutant after 8 hours at 36°C when genes a...
<p>Overall the results here show that the most accurate method is ZG04 which is consistently and sig...
<p>The accuracy comparison of DFA7 and other three methods on 2000 mixed prokaryotic and eukaryotic ...
<p>Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for both the training dataset and the test ...
<p>The left and right panels show the accuracy using the gene expression level alone and both the SN...
<p>The accuracy of <i>sumdiff/mul/sign-</i>NB for the top % genes compared with the NB accuracy for ...
<p>The accuracy of <i>sumdiff/mul/sign-k-</i>NN for the top % genes compared with the <i>k-</i>NN ac...
<p>The accuracy of <i>sumdiff/mul/sign-</i>SVM for the top % genes compared with the SVM accuracy fo...
<p>Comparison of prediction accuracy on four multiclass classification datasets by varying the numbe...
<p>Comparison of prediction accuracy on four binary classification datasets by varying the number of...
<p>(a) Gene-profile accuracy as a function of . (b) Gene-profile accuracy for each time point.</p
<p>Noisy genes is the number of noisy genes in the synthetic data. RI, ARI and NMI reflect the perfo...
Top gene candidates subjected to statistical analyses have high accuracy as single-gene classifiers....
<p>Comparison of the adjacency accuracy between PMAG and its greedy version. The number of genomes i...
<p>Note: <i>p</i> value was computed with Wilcoxon rank sum test.</p><p>Comparison of expression div...
<p>Average RNA levels in wild type and the <i>top3-105</i> mutant after 8 hours at 36°C when genes a...
<p>Overall the results here show that the most accurate method is ZG04 which is consistently and sig...
<p>The accuracy comparison of DFA7 and other three methods on 2000 mixed prokaryotic and eukaryotic ...
<p>Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for both the training dataset and the test ...
<p>The left and right panels show the accuracy using the gene expression level alone and both the SN...
DOI
Add to ORKG