Add to ORKGThe Court held that NRS 233B.130 prohibits attorney fees in petitions for judicial review of agency determinations
The Court considered an appeal from a district court order denying without prejudice and deferring a...
The Court held that an appellant who voluntarily dismisses a non-frivolous writ petition, after an a...
The Court determined that Nevada caselaw and NRCP 4(c) give conflicting opinions on whether an attor...
The Court held that NRS 233B.130 prohibits attorney fees in petitions for judicial review of agency ...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that the district court must consider the factors from the Third Resta...
The Court gave two holding in their opinion. First, judicial economy supported consideration of a pe...
The Court considered a writ of mandamus challenging district court orders denying summary judgment o...
The Court reviewed de novo whether a classified employee violated a law or regulation when she chall...
In this appeal, the Nevada Supreme Court had to determine whether an attorney that enters into a fee...
The Court determined that attorneys do not qualify as agents for the purposes of retaliatory action ...
The Court had two holdings in this case. First, a final decision for purposes of judicial review mus...
The Court affirmed the district court’s decision and held that the prosecutorial consent provision i...
The Nevada Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from a district court order granting a petition for jud...
The Court determined that when a complaint is filed with the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners...
The Nevada Supreme Court upheld district court ruling that awarded Wilfong’s counsel, serving pro bo...
The Court considered an appeal from a district court order denying without prejudice and deferring a...
The Court held that an appellant who voluntarily dismisses a non-frivolous writ petition, after an a...
The Court determined that Nevada caselaw and NRCP 4(c) give conflicting opinions on whether an attor...
The Court held that NRS 233B.130 prohibits attorney fees in petitions for judicial review of agency ...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that the district court must consider the factors from the Third Resta...
The Court gave two holding in their opinion. First, judicial economy supported consideration of a pe...
The Court considered a writ of mandamus challenging district court orders denying summary judgment o...
The Court reviewed de novo whether a classified employee violated a law or regulation when she chall...
In this appeal, the Nevada Supreme Court had to determine whether an attorney that enters into a fee...
The Court determined that attorneys do not qualify as agents for the purposes of retaliatory action ...
The Court had two holdings in this case. First, a final decision for purposes of judicial review mus...
The Court affirmed the district court’s decision and held that the prosecutorial consent provision i...
The Nevada Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from a district court order granting a petition for jud...
The Court determined that when a complaint is filed with the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners...
The Nevada Supreme Court upheld district court ruling that awarded Wilfong’s counsel, serving pro bo...
The Court considered an appeal from a district court order denying without prejudice and deferring a...
The Court held that an appellant who voluntarily dismisses a non-frivolous writ petition, after an a...
The Court determined that Nevada caselaw and NRCP 4(c) give conflicting opinions on whether an attor...