<p>Performance comparison between whole cell and partial cell aspiration techniques.</p
<p>Comparison of cell counting and developmental stage classification (Immersion objective 100X).</p
<p>Comparison of performance for various features from whole, manually segmented, and automatically ...
<p>Performance comparison of the second experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).<...
<p>Performance comparison of many metrics, including , MML, CH, SI for all algorithms in yeast cell ...
Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.</p
<p>Comparing the performance of the proposed method with other existing methods.</p
<p>Comparison of experimental and simulated results of current-voltage behavior of the cells.</p
Comparing performance of the proposed methods built with different number of individual models.</p
<p>Comparison of the performances of PASTEC, REPCLASS, and TECLASS for classification into TE classe...
Performance comparison of different fold combinations based on the five measures.</p
Performance comparison of tools for automated flow cytometry data analysis within cell and gene ther...
<p>Performance comparison of the first experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).</...
<p>Comparison of direct whole image classification, classification based on cell segmentation and cl...
<p>Comparison of model-generated single-cell AP characteristics with those measured from experiment....
<p>A comparison between our method and PRINCE. We can see that our method gives a high precision as ...
<p>Comparison of cell counting and developmental stage classification (Immersion objective 100X).</p
<p>Comparison of performance for various features from whole, manually segmented, and automatically ...
<p>Performance comparison of the second experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).<...
<p>Performance comparison of many metrics, including , MML, CH, SI for all algorithms in yeast cell ...
Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.</p
<p>Comparing the performance of the proposed method with other existing methods.</p
<p>Comparison of experimental and simulated results of current-voltage behavior of the cells.</p
Comparing performance of the proposed methods built with different number of individual models.</p
<p>Comparison of the performances of PASTEC, REPCLASS, and TECLASS for classification into TE classe...
Performance comparison of different fold combinations based on the five measures.</p
Performance comparison of tools for automated flow cytometry data analysis within cell and gene ther...
<p>Performance comparison of the first experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).</...
<p>Comparison of direct whole image classification, classification based on cell segmentation and cl...
<p>Comparison of model-generated single-cell AP characteristics with those measured from experiment....
<p>A comparison between our method and PRINCE. We can see that our method gives a high precision as ...
<p>Comparison of cell counting and developmental stage classification (Immersion objective 100X).</p
<p>Comparison of performance for various features from whole, manually segmented, and automatically ...
<p>Performance comparison of the second experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).<...
DOI
Add to ORKG