<p>The variable significance is given for all species, individual taxonomic groups and for native species only. Columns show the P value for each variable. For each model we give the R<sup>2</sup>, P-value and Akaike's second-order Information Criterion (AIC<sub>c</sub>, Burnham and Anderson 2002<sup>11</sup>).</p
Based on an analysis of 100 species-area relationships Connor and McCoy (1979) concluded that none o...
<p>The table shows the log likelihoods (A, B) and the Akaike information criterion (D) comparing thr...
Based on an analysis of 100 species-area relationships Connor and McCoy (1979) concluded that none o...
<p>Model selection based on AIC<sub>c</sub>, with a penalty of 2 per added parameter [<a href="http:...
<p>Models are ranked in order of their AIC (Akaike Information Criterion) scores, and other ranking ...
Each model shows the determinant coefficient (R2), the Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) score, t...
Models were compared by means of the Akaike information criterion (AIC). Each value represents the a...
<p>Akaike information criterion (AIC) value for high ranked models of primates' density (λ) and the ...
<p>For each model, the sample-size adjusted AIC (AICc), Akaike differences (ΔAIC), Akaike weights (w...
The various debates around model selection paradigms are important, but in lieu of a consensus, ther...
<p>Shown are information criteria for fit of models including the fixed and random effects of (A) <i...
Based on an analysis of 100 species-area relationships Connor and McCoy (1979) concluded that none o...
Based on an analysis of 100 species-area relationships Connor and McCoy (1979) concluded that none o...
Based on an analysis of 100 species-area relationships Connor and McCoy (1979) concluded that none o...
Based on an analysis of 100 species-area relationships Connor and McCoy (1979) concluded that none o...
Based on an analysis of 100 species-area relationships Connor and McCoy (1979) concluded that none o...
<p>The table shows the log likelihoods (A, B) and the Akaike information criterion (D) comparing thr...
Based on an analysis of 100 species-area relationships Connor and McCoy (1979) concluded that none o...
<p>Model selection based on AIC<sub>c</sub>, with a penalty of 2 per added parameter [<a href="http:...
<p>Models are ranked in order of their AIC (Akaike Information Criterion) scores, and other ranking ...
Each model shows the determinant coefficient (R2), the Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) score, t...
Models were compared by means of the Akaike information criterion (AIC). Each value represents the a...
<p>Akaike information criterion (AIC) value for high ranked models of primates' density (λ) and the ...
<p>For each model, the sample-size adjusted AIC (AICc), Akaike differences (ΔAIC), Akaike weights (w...
The various debates around model selection paradigms are important, but in lieu of a consensus, ther...
<p>Shown are information criteria for fit of models including the fixed and random effects of (A) <i...
Based on an analysis of 100 species-area relationships Connor and McCoy (1979) concluded that none o...
Based on an analysis of 100 species-area relationships Connor and McCoy (1979) concluded that none o...
Based on an analysis of 100 species-area relationships Connor and McCoy (1979) concluded that none o...
Based on an analysis of 100 species-area relationships Connor and McCoy (1979) concluded that none o...
Based on an analysis of 100 species-area relationships Connor and McCoy (1979) concluded that none o...
<p>The table shows the log likelihoods (A, B) and the Akaike information criterion (D) comparing thr...
Based on an analysis of 100 species-area relationships Connor and McCoy (1979) concluded that none o...