<p>Note that absolute values are not comparable between testing methods. Asterisks indicate significance levels (*** p<0.001; ** p<0.01; and * p<0.05) for comparisons of the surrogate's effectiveness versus a null-distribution of randomly selected areas (for methods 1–4) randomly paired planning units (for method 5). Method 1-incidental representation measuring median target achievement; method 2- incidental representation measuring percentage of features with targets fully met; method 3- species accumulation index (SAI) measuring median target achievement; method 4- species accumulation index (SAI) measuring percentage of features with targets fully met; and method 5- correlation of summed irreplaceability values.</p
†<p>indicates the results of our proposed methods are statistical significance over the four baselin...
<p>Summary of findings for main outcomes (Analysis I: Random effects model, 14 studies).</p
The dashed line represents the mean and 95% CI with the added, potentially unpublished, studies and ...
<p>A rank of 1 indicates highest surrogate effectiveness and 5 indicates lowest. Results are grouped...
<p>Method 1- incidental representation measuring median target achievement; method 2- incidental rep...
<p>Effectiveness values were ranked on their native scale for each method (for each method n = 24 ba...
<p>(1) In each boxplot, dots represent outliers which are beyond the interval of (Q1–1.5*IQR, Q3+1.5...
<p>Absolut distribution of positive (1–3), rather neutral (4a) and negative (4b) outcome within the ...
<p>(A) Distribution of success rate according to statistical significance of the results for the pri...
<p>Results are averaged from values for all datasets tested, i.e. datasets are accorded equal weight...
Summary of the matching results of the various measurement data used in this study.</p
<p> values are grouped by linguistic phylum with each dot representing one population. The median pe...
<p>The correlation is calculated between the expected (i.e., true) and estimated abundance for the s...
Only f4-statistics having absolute Z-scores f4-statistic classes or ascertainment schemes affected b...
<p>Three analysis methods were used to evaluate the abundance consistency of each individual candida...
†<p>indicates the results of our proposed methods are statistical significance over the four baselin...
<p>Summary of findings for main outcomes (Analysis I: Random effects model, 14 studies).</p
The dashed line represents the mean and 95% CI with the added, potentially unpublished, studies and ...
<p>A rank of 1 indicates highest surrogate effectiveness and 5 indicates lowest. Results are grouped...
<p>Method 1- incidental representation measuring median target achievement; method 2- incidental rep...
<p>Effectiveness values were ranked on their native scale for each method (for each method n = 24 ba...
<p>(1) In each boxplot, dots represent outliers which are beyond the interval of (Q1–1.5*IQR, Q3+1.5...
<p>Absolut distribution of positive (1–3), rather neutral (4a) and negative (4b) outcome within the ...
<p>(A) Distribution of success rate according to statistical significance of the results for the pri...
<p>Results are averaged from values for all datasets tested, i.e. datasets are accorded equal weight...
Summary of the matching results of the various measurement data used in this study.</p
<p> values are grouped by linguistic phylum with each dot representing one population. The median pe...
<p>The correlation is calculated between the expected (i.e., true) and estimated abundance for the s...
Only f4-statistics having absolute Z-scores f4-statistic classes or ascertainment schemes affected b...
<p>Three analysis methods were used to evaluate the abundance consistency of each individual candida...
†<p>indicates the results of our proposed methods are statistical significance over the four baselin...
<p>Summary of findings for main outcomes (Analysis I: Random effects model, 14 studies).</p
The dashed line represents the mean and 95% CI with the added, potentially unpublished, studies and ...