<p>We merged developed low, medium, and high intensity into the impervious class and changed developed open-space to managed clearing, and combined the percent impervious proportion of the developed types into the impervious class and merged the remaining proportion with herbaceous land cover to create managed clearings. Missing values indicate no comparison.</p
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 2001 National Land Cover Database (NLCD) was compared to the U.S. ...
The PEEL0 land cover data set for the conterminous USA characterizes each of its five arc-minute (5′...
Comparison map (Upper Pittsgrove) of developed and vacant land derived from TIGER and LANDSAT TM; th...
Urban ecosystem assessments increasingly rely on widely available map products, such as the U.S. Geo...
We developed a method that analyzes the quality of the cultivated cropland class mapped in the USA N...
<p>(a) The 2012 National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery for a detail view of land use an...
<p>A comparison of the National Land Use database (2010) against the National Land Cover Dataset (20...
<p>Land use and land cover estimates across the urban-rural gradients of Atlanta, Charlotte, and Ral...
The United States National Land Cover Database (NLCD), developed from the early 1990s to 2006, is an...
<p>Proportions of mapped land use and land cover types derived from the National Land Cover Database...
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 2001 National Land Cover Database (NLCD) was compared to the U.S. ...
<p>Land use and land cover estimates based on 50 randomly selected 1-km<sup>2</sup> segments across ...
Map (Piscataway) shows graphic and spatial relationships between TIGER and LANDSAT data.While the pe...
This study presents the results of comparing land use estimates between three different data sets fo...
The growing numbers of land change models makes it difficult to select a model at the beginning of a...
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 2001 National Land Cover Database (NLCD) was compared to the U.S. ...
The PEEL0 land cover data set for the conterminous USA characterizes each of its five arc-minute (5′...
Comparison map (Upper Pittsgrove) of developed and vacant land derived from TIGER and LANDSAT TM; th...
Urban ecosystem assessments increasingly rely on widely available map products, such as the U.S. Geo...
We developed a method that analyzes the quality of the cultivated cropland class mapped in the USA N...
<p>(a) The 2012 National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery for a detail view of land use an...
<p>A comparison of the National Land Use database (2010) against the National Land Cover Dataset (20...
<p>Land use and land cover estimates across the urban-rural gradients of Atlanta, Charlotte, and Ral...
The United States National Land Cover Database (NLCD), developed from the early 1990s to 2006, is an...
<p>Proportions of mapped land use and land cover types derived from the National Land Cover Database...
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 2001 National Land Cover Database (NLCD) was compared to the U.S. ...
<p>Land use and land cover estimates based on 50 randomly selected 1-km<sup>2</sup> segments across ...
Map (Piscataway) shows graphic and spatial relationships between TIGER and LANDSAT data.While the pe...
This study presents the results of comparing land use estimates between three different data sets fo...
The growing numbers of land change models makes it difficult to select a model at the beginning of a...
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 2001 National Land Cover Database (NLCD) was compared to the U.S. ...
The PEEL0 land cover data set for the conterminous USA characterizes each of its five arc-minute (5′...
Comparison map (Upper Pittsgrove) of developed and vacant land derived from TIGER and LANDSAT TM; th...