<p><b>A)</b> Lateral pointing error in the different reward groups of the reward only condition. <b>B)</b> Lateral pointing error in the different reward groups of the reward + error condition. <b>C)</b> IMI rating for the different reward conditions (low, medium, high, random) as a function of the proportion rewarded trials with standard error of the mean. The results for the random and medium reward condition are overlapping.</p
<p>Behavioral accuracies averaged across 14 participants in 3°, 9°, and 15° conditions for the block...
<p><b>Top left</b>: Mean reaction time per condition. <b>Top right</b>: Confidence assigned to estim...
<p>Rejections are shown for the disadvantageous inequity condition (A) and the advantageous inequity...
<p>Distribution of trial-by-trial changes in the lateral error following rewarded and non-rewarded t...
<p>In <b>A)</b>, all experimental trials are represented in the line graph (bins 1–50), where each p...
(A) Subject-averaged circular variance of the estimation error distribution as a function of the tri...
(A) Subject-averaged circular variance of the estimation error distribution as a function of the amo...
<p>High rewards and low rewards have no significant difference in effect on percentage of correct ru...
<p>All experimental trials are represented in the line graph (bins 1–50), where each point represent...
<p> <b>3: mean percentage of immediate reward as a function of the manipulations of the “poverty” st...
<p>a) Results obtained in our previous research, showing that the effect of reward bias depended on ...
<p>The difference score was calculated by subtracting narrow—wide error for each participant. The av...
Rewards are re-normalized. Results are presented as mean ± standard error between subjects (N = 25)....
<p>We investigate the effect of the reward function shape by changing it ...
<p>A. Experiment 1– Expected value – variance manipulation. B. Experiment 2– Variance – skewness man...
<p>Behavioral accuracies averaged across 14 participants in 3°, 9°, and 15° conditions for the block...
<p><b>Top left</b>: Mean reaction time per condition. <b>Top right</b>: Confidence assigned to estim...
<p>Rejections are shown for the disadvantageous inequity condition (A) and the advantageous inequity...
<p>Distribution of trial-by-trial changes in the lateral error following rewarded and non-rewarded t...
<p>In <b>A)</b>, all experimental trials are represented in the line graph (bins 1–50), where each p...
(A) Subject-averaged circular variance of the estimation error distribution as a function of the tri...
(A) Subject-averaged circular variance of the estimation error distribution as a function of the amo...
<p>High rewards and low rewards have no significant difference in effect on percentage of correct ru...
<p>All experimental trials are represented in the line graph (bins 1–50), where each point represent...
<p> <b>3: mean percentage of immediate reward as a function of the manipulations of the “poverty” st...
<p>a) Results obtained in our previous research, showing that the effect of reward bias depended on ...
<p>The difference score was calculated by subtracting narrow—wide error for each participant. The av...
Rewards are re-normalized. Results are presented as mean ± standard error between subjects (N = 25)....
<p>We investigate the effect of the reward function shape by changing it ...
<p>A. Experiment 1– Expected value – variance manipulation. B. Experiment 2– Variance – skewness man...
<p>Behavioral accuracies averaged across 14 participants in 3°, 9°, and 15° conditions for the block...
<p><b>Top left</b>: Mean reaction time per condition. <b>Top right</b>: Confidence assigned to estim...
<p>Rejections are shown for the disadvantageous inequity condition (A) and the advantageous inequity...