Table shows the assortativity coefficients and significance levels for shark individual parameters, after network analyses were undertaken separately for each study site
<p>The relationship between individual species and the fish species density ordination based on the ...
<p>(*specific species to the study; **common species for two studies; ***common species for all stud...
In recent decades, network analyses have become ubiquitous in ecology, facilitating our understandin...
The more days two sharks where observed together at the study site, the fewer agonistic interactions...
A. Sharks produced more agonistic behaviours for each competitor present as rival numbers increased....
To adapt to their environment, organisms can either directly interact with their surroundings or use...
Proportion of interactions (Type 0, 1, and 2) by C. carcharias during control and active trials. n r...
A. A custom monitoring system allowed us to record the behaviour (vertical camera) and identity (hor...
<p>Dendrogram showing the groupings of individual sharks based on their calculated residency indices...
Many shark species form groups; yet the drivers of this behaviour are not well understood. Aggregati...
<p>Unfamiliar fish were paired interspecifically in a neutral arena subsequent to 5 days of isolatio...
Capitalized letters above bars denote significant groupings (ppost-hoc pairwise comparisons.</p
The mechanisms and functions of shark grouping behaviour have received relatively little scientific ...
Spatial separation within predator communities can arise via territoriality but also from competitiv...
<p>Axis 1 and 2 explaining 56% of the variation. Note WA and SF-2 clearly separated but WA and SF-1 ...
<p>The relationship between individual species and the fish species density ordination based on the ...
<p>(*specific species to the study; **common species for two studies; ***common species for all stud...
In recent decades, network analyses have become ubiquitous in ecology, facilitating our understandin...
The more days two sharks where observed together at the study site, the fewer agonistic interactions...
A. Sharks produced more agonistic behaviours for each competitor present as rival numbers increased....
To adapt to their environment, organisms can either directly interact with their surroundings or use...
Proportion of interactions (Type 0, 1, and 2) by C. carcharias during control and active trials. n r...
A. A custom monitoring system allowed us to record the behaviour (vertical camera) and identity (hor...
<p>Dendrogram showing the groupings of individual sharks based on their calculated residency indices...
Many shark species form groups; yet the drivers of this behaviour are not well understood. Aggregati...
<p>Unfamiliar fish were paired interspecifically in a neutral arena subsequent to 5 days of isolatio...
Capitalized letters above bars denote significant groupings (ppost-hoc pairwise comparisons.</p
The mechanisms and functions of shark grouping behaviour have received relatively little scientific ...
Spatial separation within predator communities can arise via territoriality but also from competitiv...
<p>Axis 1 and 2 explaining 56% of the variation. Note WA and SF-2 clearly separated but WA and SF-1 ...
<p>The relationship between individual species and the fish species density ordination based on the ...
<p>(*specific species to the study; **common species for two studies; ***common species for all stud...
In recent decades, network analyses have become ubiquitous in ecology, facilitating our understandin...
DOI
Add to ORKG