Retribution demands reciprocity. In this Essay, Professor Campos contends that classic retributive theory encounters a logical paradox when it attempts to equalize the status of criminal and victim through the institution of punishment. This paradox arises out of a clash between the deontological requirements of equality and justice. He concludes by speculating on the historical relationship between rationalist justifications for vengeance and the elimination of punishment as public spectacle
In this paper I argue for a theory of punishment I call Multilateral Retributivism. Typically retrib...
The article discusses the development of theories of punishment in modern, more and more knowledge-b...
Can punishment, a practice which involves the deliberate infliction of suffering, be justified? Retr...
Retribution demands reciprocity. In this Essay, Professor Campos contends that classic retributive t...
Two main types of principle, retributive and consequentialist, have long been identified as the main...
Theories of punishment seek to validate the use of punishments and maintain societal order. These th...
Retributive tbeory has long held pride of place among theories of criminal punishment in both philos...
Retributive theory has long held pride of place among theories of criminal punishment in both philos...
In this paper I discuss retributivist justifications for legal punishment. I argue that the main mor...
Retributivist and consequentialist justifications for criminal punishment have contended for generat...
There is a school of retributive punishment theory that seeks to justify punishment by reference to ...
This article argues that the justification of punishment is best conceived as a problem of political...
According to retributivism, what justifies punishment is a wrongdoer\u27s desert. Critics argue that...
When novelists and philosophers turn to the work of lawyers, they tend to gravitate toward certain i...
The retributive principle is that offenders should be punished because and only because they have cu...
In this paper I argue for a theory of punishment I call Multilateral Retributivism. Typically retrib...
The article discusses the development of theories of punishment in modern, more and more knowledge-b...
Can punishment, a practice which involves the deliberate infliction of suffering, be justified? Retr...
Retribution demands reciprocity. In this Essay, Professor Campos contends that classic retributive t...
Two main types of principle, retributive and consequentialist, have long been identified as the main...
Theories of punishment seek to validate the use of punishments and maintain societal order. These th...
Retributive tbeory has long held pride of place among theories of criminal punishment in both philos...
Retributive theory has long held pride of place among theories of criminal punishment in both philos...
In this paper I discuss retributivist justifications for legal punishment. I argue that the main mor...
Retributivist and consequentialist justifications for criminal punishment have contended for generat...
There is a school of retributive punishment theory that seeks to justify punishment by reference to ...
This article argues that the justification of punishment is best conceived as a problem of political...
According to retributivism, what justifies punishment is a wrongdoer\u27s desert. Critics argue that...
When novelists and philosophers turn to the work of lawyers, they tend to gravitate toward certain i...
The retributive principle is that offenders should be punished because and only because they have cu...
In this paper I argue for a theory of punishment I call Multilateral Retributivism. Typically retrib...
The article discusses the development of theories of punishment in modern, more and more knowledge-b...
Can punishment, a practice which involves the deliberate infliction of suffering, be justified? Retr...
.jpg%3Fwidth%3D300&w=3840&q=75)
Add to ORKG