§4.1. Introduction. None of the contract cases decided during the 1963 Survey year requires extensive comment. This conclusion probably reflects an approval of the manner in which the Supreme .Judicial Court handled the many issues presented by litigants. In reviewing a year\u27s judicial production, it is easier to get excited about a decision that one disapproves. One trend is worthy of note. From the cases discussed in this and other chapters, it is apparent that the Court is becoming more sophisticated in its understanding and use of the Uniform Commercial Code
Most Contracts casebooks feature either Baird v. Gimbel or Drennan v. Star Paving to illustrate the ...
Judicial opinions rarely identify the precise sequence in which the issues presented were addressed ...
There is only one way to record accurately the progress of any branch of the law over a period of ti...
§4.1. Introduction. The 1961 Annual Suroey of American Law pointed to the Uniform Commercial Code as...
In any given twelve-month reporting period there is, for some reason, a case emphasis on particular ...
§6.1. Covenants not to compete. In the 1961 ANNUAL SURVEY, attention was called to the large number...
During the Survey period, the Michigan Supreme Court decided cases involving mutual mistake, the enf...
In two recent cases, the Supreme Court of the United States held that state legislation had impaired...
This article considers how courts have responded to the inclusion of six innovative rules in the Res...
Monclova v. Arnett, 3 N.Y.2d 33, 163 N.Y.S.2d 652 (1957); Emily Shops v. Interstate Truck Line, 2 N....
April Publications, Inc. v. G. Schirmer, Inc., 308 N. Y. 366, 126 N. E. 2d 283 (1955)
Mutual Assents: In the case of Jones v. Horner it appeared that Jones was a tenant of Mrs. Homer. Th...
I. Promissory Estoppel--Application by Federal Court II. Third Party Beneficiary--Enforcement of Lab...
Section 2-302 of the Uniform Commercial Code (Code) provides that a court may refuse to enforce all ...
The Supreme Court simply stopped talking about the limits of arbitration as a mechanism for the adju...
Most Contracts casebooks feature either Baird v. Gimbel or Drennan v. Star Paving to illustrate the ...
Judicial opinions rarely identify the precise sequence in which the issues presented were addressed ...
There is only one way to record accurately the progress of any branch of the law over a period of ti...
§4.1. Introduction. The 1961 Annual Suroey of American Law pointed to the Uniform Commercial Code as...
In any given twelve-month reporting period there is, for some reason, a case emphasis on particular ...
§6.1. Covenants not to compete. In the 1961 ANNUAL SURVEY, attention was called to the large number...
During the Survey period, the Michigan Supreme Court decided cases involving mutual mistake, the enf...
In two recent cases, the Supreme Court of the United States held that state legislation had impaired...
This article considers how courts have responded to the inclusion of six innovative rules in the Res...
Monclova v. Arnett, 3 N.Y.2d 33, 163 N.Y.S.2d 652 (1957); Emily Shops v. Interstate Truck Line, 2 N....
April Publications, Inc. v. G. Schirmer, Inc., 308 N. Y. 366, 126 N. E. 2d 283 (1955)
Mutual Assents: In the case of Jones v. Horner it appeared that Jones was a tenant of Mrs. Homer. Th...
I. Promissory Estoppel--Application by Federal Court II. Third Party Beneficiary--Enforcement of Lab...
Section 2-302 of the Uniform Commercial Code (Code) provides that a court may refuse to enforce all ...
The Supreme Court simply stopped talking about the limits of arbitration as a mechanism for the adju...
Most Contracts casebooks feature either Baird v. Gimbel or Drennan v. Star Paving to illustrate the ...
Judicial opinions rarely identify the precise sequence in which the issues presented were addressed ...
There is only one way to record accurately the progress of any branch of the law over a period of ti...