Battaglio, Kagel, and Jiranyakul use experimental tests to compare rank-dependent expected utility (RDEU), regret theory, prospect theory, and Machina's generalized smooth preferences model. They conclude that none of these models consistently organizes the data. The purpose of this note is to point out that RDEU theory was tested in combination with a hypothesis on the choice of functional form that has been explicitly rejected by the original author of the model (Quiggin, 1982, 1987). When the original form of RDEU theory is tested, it performs quite well
The paper shows that: (1) The preference reversal phenomenon is consistent with transitive preferenc...
Individual true and error theory assumes that responses by the same person to the same choice proble...
There is much evidence that people willingly violate expected utility theory when making choices. S...
Experimental investigations of non-expected utility have primarily concentrated on decision under ri...
The Random Utility Model (RUM) and the Random Preference Model (RPM) are important tools in the econ...
In a comment to Cappelen, Hole, Sørensen, and Tungodden (2007b), Conte and Moffatt (2009) challenge...
In a comment to Cappelen, Hole, Sørensen, and Tungodden (2007b), Conte and Moffatt (2009) challenge...
In a comment to Cappelen, Hole, Sørensen, and Tungodden (2007b), Conte and Moffatt (2009) challenge ...
This paper extends the literature on the estimation of expected utility and non-expected-utility pre...
textabstractThis article compares classical expected utility (EU) with the more general rank-depende...
Although expected utility (EU) theory is a powerful tool for the analysis of decision under risk, it...
Individuals often have only incompletely known preferences when choosing between pair-wise gambles. ...
In this paper, the empirical performance of several preference functionals is assessed using individ...
Guo and Regenwetter (2014) took the perceived relative argument model, added various auxiliary assum...
Subjective expected utility (SEU) embodies four distinct prin-ciples ofrational behavior. Although a...
The paper shows that: (1) The preference reversal phenomenon is consistent with transitive preferenc...
Individual true and error theory assumes that responses by the same person to the same choice proble...
There is much evidence that people willingly violate expected utility theory when making choices. S...
Experimental investigations of non-expected utility have primarily concentrated on decision under ri...
The Random Utility Model (RUM) and the Random Preference Model (RPM) are important tools in the econ...
In a comment to Cappelen, Hole, Sørensen, and Tungodden (2007b), Conte and Moffatt (2009) challenge...
In a comment to Cappelen, Hole, Sørensen, and Tungodden (2007b), Conte and Moffatt (2009) challenge...
In a comment to Cappelen, Hole, Sørensen, and Tungodden (2007b), Conte and Moffatt (2009) challenge ...
This paper extends the literature on the estimation of expected utility and non-expected-utility pre...
textabstractThis article compares classical expected utility (EU) with the more general rank-depende...
Although expected utility (EU) theory is a powerful tool for the analysis of decision under risk, it...
Individuals often have only incompletely known preferences when choosing between pair-wise gambles. ...
In this paper, the empirical performance of several preference functionals is assessed using individ...
Guo and Regenwetter (2014) took the perceived relative argument model, added various auxiliary assum...
Subjective expected utility (SEU) embodies four distinct prin-ciples ofrational behavior. Although a...
The paper shows that: (1) The preference reversal phenomenon is consistent with transitive preferenc...
Individual true and error theory assumes that responses by the same person to the same choice proble...
There is much evidence that people willingly violate expected utility theory when making choices. S...