One of the major concerns raised by people using negotiation processes is about the fairness or justice of the process. Individuals undertake negotiation to derive better outcomes than would otherwise occur, which requires them to engage in interest-based negotiation. But interest-based negotiation focuses upon the interests of the disputants rather than any objective legal measures of "fairness" – that is, legal justness, not the more commonly accepted negotiation concept of meeting the interests of all parties equally. It is vital to investigate how to develop measures, or at the very least principles, for the construction of legally just negotiation support systems. This article discusses processes that, when applied, will encourage fair...
In all of negotiation, there is no bigger trap than fairness. This chapter from the Negotiator\u27...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Delivering judgment in the House of Lords in the case of White v White (subsequently a leading legal...
One of the major concerns raised by people using negotiation processes is about the fairness or just...
One of the major concerns raised by people using negotiation processes is about the fairness or just...
Traditional negotiation support systems focus on providing users with decision support that allows d...
One of the major concerns raised by people using negotiation processes is about the fairness of the ...
One of the major concerns raised by people using Negotiation Support Systems is about the fairness ...
Most negotiation support systems have focused upon the notion of meeting the disputants’ interests. ...
In this special issue we display a variety of approaches to the study of justice. Articles from scho...
Part I of this Article provides background on procedural justice and its relationship to negotiation...
This review article examines the literature regarding the role played by principles of justice in ne...
This practical guide covers more than fifty key negotiation topics. It is the only book on negotiati...
Presents an overview of alternative dispute resolution ADR and contrasts the quality of justice it a...
In all of negotiation, there is no bigger trap than fairness. This chapter from the Negotiator\u27...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Delivering judgment in the House of Lords in the case of White v White (subsequently a leading legal...
One of the major concerns raised by people using negotiation processes is about the fairness or just...
One of the major concerns raised by people using negotiation processes is about the fairness or just...
Traditional negotiation support systems focus on providing users with decision support that allows d...
One of the major concerns raised by people using negotiation processes is about the fairness of the ...
One of the major concerns raised by people using Negotiation Support Systems is about the fairness ...
Most negotiation support systems have focused upon the notion of meeting the disputants’ interests. ...
In this special issue we display a variety of approaches to the study of justice. Articles from scho...
Part I of this Article provides background on procedural justice and its relationship to negotiation...
This review article examines the literature regarding the role played by principles of justice in ne...
This practical guide covers more than fifty key negotiation topics. It is the only book on negotiati...
Presents an overview of alternative dispute resolution ADR and contrasts the quality of justice it a...
In all of negotiation, there is no bigger trap than fairness. This chapter from the Negotiator\u27...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Delivering judgment in the House of Lords in the case of White v White (subsequently a leading legal...