This Article argues that the pending feuds between neighboring states over marijuana decriminalization demonstrate the need for a strict doctrine limiting a state’s regulatory authority to its own borders. Precedent recognizes that the dormant Commerce Clause (“DCC”) “precludes the application of a state statute to commerce that takes place wholly outside the State’s borders, whether or not the commerce has effects within the State.” This prohibition protects “the autonomy of the individual States within their respective spheres” by dictating that “[n]o state has the authority to tell other polities what laws they must enact or how affairs must be conducted.” But this principle was called into doubt in July 2015 by the U.S. Court of Appeals...
As marijuana regulation at the local level becomes at odds with federal policy, an interesting quest...
The new marijuana federalism is here, but is it here to stay? In this Article, I address that questi...
In 1895, the New York Court of Appeals, in refusing to enforce a Kansas statute, referred to “a prin...
This Article argues that the pending feuds between neighboring states over marijuana decriminalizati...
This Article asserts that states may invoke the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction to challenge m...
This Article asserts that states may invoke the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction to challenge m...
As more states proceed with marijuana legalization laws, questions have arisen about how to accommod...
As more states proceed with marijuana legalization laws, questions have arisen about how to accommod...
Over the past twenty-five years, states have developed elaborate regulatory systems to govern lawful...
In contemporary America, legislators send messages about values through symbolic legislation and law...
As more states proceed with marijuana legalization laws, questions have arisen about how to accommod...
In contemporary America, legislators send messages about values through symbolic legislation and law...
The struggle over marijuana regulation is one of the most important federalism conflicts in a genera...
Reefer madness is sweeping the nation. Despite a federal ban on marijuana, states have begun to lega...
The Trump administration inherits the Obama administration’s policy of under-enforcing federal marij...
As marijuana regulation at the local level becomes at odds with federal policy, an interesting quest...
The new marijuana federalism is here, but is it here to stay? In this Article, I address that questi...
In 1895, the New York Court of Appeals, in refusing to enforce a Kansas statute, referred to “a prin...
This Article argues that the pending feuds between neighboring states over marijuana decriminalizati...
This Article asserts that states may invoke the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction to challenge m...
This Article asserts that states may invoke the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction to challenge m...
As more states proceed with marijuana legalization laws, questions have arisen about how to accommod...
As more states proceed with marijuana legalization laws, questions have arisen about how to accommod...
Over the past twenty-five years, states have developed elaborate regulatory systems to govern lawful...
In contemporary America, legislators send messages about values through symbolic legislation and law...
As more states proceed with marijuana legalization laws, questions have arisen about how to accommod...
In contemporary America, legislators send messages about values through symbolic legislation and law...
The struggle over marijuana regulation is one of the most important federalism conflicts in a genera...
Reefer madness is sweeping the nation. Despite a federal ban on marijuana, states have begun to lega...
The Trump administration inherits the Obama administration’s policy of under-enforcing federal marij...
As marijuana regulation at the local level becomes at odds with federal policy, an interesting quest...
The new marijuana federalism is here, but is it here to stay? In this Article, I address that questi...
In 1895, the New York Court of Appeals, in refusing to enforce a Kansas statute, referred to “a prin...