This chapter discusses several of the key attributes of the rule of law and explores their relevance for Canadian administrative law: the rule of law as an unwritten constitutional principle; the rule of law as a political ideal which structures institutional relations and competencies; and, the rule of law as a distinctive political morality which, in Canada, is understood as a dialogue among the three branches of government. The chapter assesses the Canadian articulation of the rule of law in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Canada, then turns to the contemporary judicial review of administrative action. Recent case law illustrates how the rule of law informs how judges engage with statutes through the modern approach to interpre...
Canadian lawyers make far too little use of the rich body of administrative law which has been devel...
This thesis examines the concept of “deference” in relation to judicial review of administrative dec...
Abstract: For forty years, from the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in CUPE to the 2019 one in Vavilov...
This chapter discusses several of the key attributes of the rule of law and explores their relevance...
Recent administrative law decisions from the Supreme Court of Canada have renewed the idea that ther...
Although the Supreme Court of Canada’s seminal decision in Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick has now been ci...
This thesis examines the uncertainty in Canadian public law arising from the Supreme Court of Canada...
ii This thesis examines the uncertainty in Canadian public law arising from the Supreme Court of Can...
Administrative law in Canada, as in many other Commonwealth countries, centers around judicial revie...
Administrative law in Canada, as in many other common law countries, centres around judicial review ...
The Canadian administrative state has changed significantly since the first half of the twentieth ce...
This thesis surveys the last three decades of Canadian jurisprudence on the standards of review appl...
In an upcoming set of cases, the Supreme Court of Canada will review its approach to the standard of...
Good governance is one of the important values that administrative law serves. It is a complex conce...
Public law scholarship in the common law tradition often aims at elucidating a connection between la...
Canadian lawyers make far too little use of the rich body of administrative law which has been devel...
This thesis examines the concept of “deference” in relation to judicial review of administrative dec...
Abstract: For forty years, from the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in CUPE to the 2019 one in Vavilov...
This chapter discusses several of the key attributes of the rule of law and explores their relevance...
Recent administrative law decisions from the Supreme Court of Canada have renewed the idea that ther...
Although the Supreme Court of Canada’s seminal decision in Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick has now been ci...
This thesis examines the uncertainty in Canadian public law arising from the Supreme Court of Canada...
ii This thesis examines the uncertainty in Canadian public law arising from the Supreme Court of Can...
Administrative law in Canada, as in many other Commonwealth countries, centers around judicial revie...
Administrative law in Canada, as in many other common law countries, centres around judicial review ...
The Canadian administrative state has changed significantly since the first half of the twentieth ce...
This thesis surveys the last three decades of Canadian jurisprudence on the standards of review appl...
In an upcoming set of cases, the Supreme Court of Canada will review its approach to the standard of...
Good governance is one of the important values that administrative law serves. It is a complex conce...
Public law scholarship in the common law tradition often aims at elucidating a connection between la...
Canadian lawyers make far too little use of the rich body of administrative law which has been devel...
This thesis examines the concept of “deference” in relation to judicial review of administrative dec...
Abstract: For forty years, from the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in CUPE to the 2019 one in Vavilov...