IMMIGRATION AND THE JUDICIARY: LAW AND POLITICS IN BRITAIN AND AMERICA. By Stephen H. Legomsky.t New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, 1987. Pp. xxxix, 345. $68.00 (hardbound). Why are courts generally reluctant to vindicate the claims of aliens seeking to come to or remain in a foreign country? What makes immigration unique as a subject for judicial intervention in terms of deference to the prerogatives of the other branches of government, to the detriment of individual rights? These questions, which have long puzzled practitioners, are addressed by Professor Legomsky in Immigration and the Judiciary. His method is to examine and compare judicial review of immigration cases in the United Kingdom and the United States
A careful analysis of the American immigration law points at two important tendencies. First, the di...
The United States immigration system is challenged by a case backlog that plagues the ability for ou...
Among the many problems facing u.s. immigration law is a crisis of discretion and judicial deference...
IMMIGRATION AND THE JUDICIARY: LAW AND POLITICS IN BRITAIN AND AMERICA. By Stephen H. Legomsky.t New...
This thesis analyses the role of the Judiciary in cases arising under the immigration laws of the Un...
This book analyses how the system of immigration judicial reviews works in practice, as an area whic...
For the past quarter century, the “plenary power” doctrine of immigration law—under which courts sus...
The Immigration and Nationality Act vests enormous discretion in the Attorney General and subordinat...
What roles have lawyers played in the British immigration system? Have these roles made the system m...
This Article examines the conflicting decisions of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth ...
Legal scholars and judges have long examined the role of judicial review in immigration matters, and...
This article discusses judicial review in immigration cases. The author states that the courts are t...
The Immigration and Nationality Act vests enormous discretion in the Attorney General and her subord...
This paper explores the validity of three predominant legal reasons for precluding immigrants from h...
In 1952, Congress established a new federal position to be filled by “special inquiry officers” char...
A careful analysis of the American immigration law points at two important tendencies. First, the di...
The United States immigration system is challenged by a case backlog that plagues the ability for ou...
Among the many problems facing u.s. immigration law is a crisis of discretion and judicial deference...
IMMIGRATION AND THE JUDICIARY: LAW AND POLITICS IN BRITAIN AND AMERICA. By Stephen H. Legomsky.t New...
This thesis analyses the role of the Judiciary in cases arising under the immigration laws of the Un...
This book analyses how the system of immigration judicial reviews works in practice, as an area whic...
For the past quarter century, the “plenary power” doctrine of immigration law—under which courts sus...
The Immigration and Nationality Act vests enormous discretion in the Attorney General and subordinat...
What roles have lawyers played in the British immigration system? Have these roles made the system m...
This Article examines the conflicting decisions of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth ...
Legal scholars and judges have long examined the role of judicial review in immigration matters, and...
This article discusses judicial review in immigration cases. The author states that the courts are t...
The Immigration and Nationality Act vests enormous discretion in the Attorney General and her subord...
This paper explores the validity of three predominant legal reasons for precluding immigrants from h...
In 1952, Congress established a new federal position to be filled by “special inquiry officers” char...
A careful analysis of the American immigration law points at two important tendencies. First, the di...
The United States immigration system is challenged by a case backlog that plagues the ability for ou...
Among the many problems facing u.s. immigration law is a crisis of discretion and judicial deference...