This Note examines, through an experimental design, whether juror biases against black defendants are explained by aversive racism theory or social identity theory and whether procedural justice can be used to decrease biases. The Note also examines whether the timing of debiasing jury instructions affects judgments of guilt. The experiment finds that pre- evidence instructions result in lower judgments of guilt than post-evidence instructions. In addition, aversive racism theory, but not social identity theory or procedural justice, explains guilt judgments. The experiment has implications for both the content and timing of jury instructions in trials
The present studies compare the judgments of White and Black mock jurors in interracial trials. In S...
Theories of modern racism suggest that the level of prejudice toward black Americans has not decreas...
Common wisdom seems to suggest that racial bias, defined as disparate treatment of minority defendan...
This Note examines, through an experimental design, whether juror biases against black defendants ar...
Studies documenting the existence of prejudice in simulated juror ratings of guilt may not be direct...
Both Black and White jurors exhibit a racial bias by being more likely to find defendants of a diffe...
In a time of heightened tension in the United States, we explored how defendant race (White vs. Blac...
Current social and legal constraints tend to preclude the overt expression of racism in America ther...
Two studies examined the effectiveness of the Unconscious Bias Juror (UBJ) video and instructions at...
Background: Research has shown that crime concepts can activate attentional bias to Black faces. Thi...
In recent years, social injustice and racial bias in the United States has become a main focus withi...
Judges are increasingly using “implicit bias” instructions in jury trials in an effort to reduce the...
BACKGROUND: Research has shown that crime concepts can activate attentional bias to Black faces. Thi...
Before the 1990s controlled research using mock jurors consistently found black defendants guilty mo...
Background: Research has shown that crime concepts can activate attentional bias to Black faces. Thi...
The present studies compare the judgments of White and Black mock jurors in interracial trials. In S...
Theories of modern racism suggest that the level of prejudice toward black Americans has not decreas...
Common wisdom seems to suggest that racial bias, defined as disparate treatment of minority defendan...
This Note examines, through an experimental design, whether juror biases against black defendants ar...
Studies documenting the existence of prejudice in simulated juror ratings of guilt may not be direct...
Both Black and White jurors exhibit a racial bias by being more likely to find defendants of a diffe...
In a time of heightened tension in the United States, we explored how defendant race (White vs. Blac...
Current social and legal constraints tend to preclude the overt expression of racism in America ther...
Two studies examined the effectiveness of the Unconscious Bias Juror (UBJ) video and instructions at...
Background: Research has shown that crime concepts can activate attentional bias to Black faces. Thi...
In recent years, social injustice and racial bias in the United States has become a main focus withi...
Judges are increasingly using “implicit bias” instructions in jury trials in an effort to reduce the...
BACKGROUND: Research has shown that crime concepts can activate attentional bias to Black faces. Thi...
Before the 1990s controlled research using mock jurors consistently found black defendants guilty mo...
Background: Research has shown that crime concepts can activate attentional bias to Black faces. Thi...
The present studies compare the judgments of White and Black mock jurors in interracial trials. In S...
Theories of modern racism suggest that the level of prejudice toward black Americans has not decreas...
Common wisdom seems to suggest that racial bias, defined as disparate treatment of minority defendan...