Not unexpectedly, homophobic attitudes pervade judicial decisions denying rights to homosexuals. It is, however, somewhat confounding to detect degrading stereotypes about lesbians and gay men in decisions that purport to advance lesbian and gay rights. By way of example, a recent Virginia Court of Appeals decision, Bottoms v. Bottoms, was one that civil libertarians and commentators had hailed as a victory for homosexuals.\u27 That Bottoms case, however, was paradoxical. Although in Bottoms, the lesbian mother emerged triumphant with her child, the court of appeals nevertheless promoted certain damaging, outmoded notions about homosexuals
This article considers three recent court judgments that resulted from challenges by homosexual men ...
Disputes over custody and visitation can arise when a marriage ends and one parent comes out as gay ...
In a recent decision concerning adoption, the Virginia Supreme Court declined to hold that every le...
Not unexpectedly, homophobic attitudes pervade judicial decisions denying rights to homosexuals. It ...
This Article traces and analyzes the series of legal and factual events leading up to the Virginia S...
Disputes in family law, particularly in child custody and access cases, often involve emotionally ch...
Divorce can be one of the most traumatic and stressful experiences a person will undergo in his or h...
The U.S. Supreme Court’s three most important gay and lesbian rights decisions—Obergefell v. Hodges,...
The custody determinations involving Lesbian mothers raise constitutional issues which must be exami...
In 1994, national media attention focused on the Virginia case Bottoms v. Bottoms, in which Kay Bott...
As we think about the future role the judicial branch will play in our governance, we might consider...
This paper deals with the role of American courts, specifically their decisions, regarding the right...
Discrimination persists in courts\u27 consideration of lesbian mothers\u27 petitions for custody of ...
In the last fifteen years constitutional issues regarding the rights of gays, lesbians and same-sex ...
The Supreme Court decision in Mossop amounts to a postponement of, rather than a precedent on, the i...
This article considers three recent court judgments that resulted from challenges by homosexual men ...
Disputes over custody and visitation can arise when a marriage ends and one parent comes out as gay ...
In a recent decision concerning adoption, the Virginia Supreme Court declined to hold that every le...
Not unexpectedly, homophobic attitudes pervade judicial decisions denying rights to homosexuals. It ...
This Article traces and analyzes the series of legal and factual events leading up to the Virginia S...
Disputes in family law, particularly in child custody and access cases, often involve emotionally ch...
Divorce can be one of the most traumatic and stressful experiences a person will undergo in his or h...
The U.S. Supreme Court’s three most important gay and lesbian rights decisions—Obergefell v. Hodges,...
The custody determinations involving Lesbian mothers raise constitutional issues which must be exami...
In 1994, national media attention focused on the Virginia case Bottoms v. Bottoms, in which Kay Bott...
As we think about the future role the judicial branch will play in our governance, we might consider...
This paper deals with the role of American courts, specifically their decisions, regarding the right...
Discrimination persists in courts\u27 consideration of lesbian mothers\u27 petitions for custody of ...
In the last fifteen years constitutional issues regarding the rights of gays, lesbians and same-sex ...
The Supreme Court decision in Mossop amounts to a postponement of, rather than a precedent on, the i...
This article considers three recent court judgments that resulted from challenges by homosexual men ...
Disputes over custody and visitation can arise when a marriage ends and one parent comes out as gay ...
In a recent decision concerning adoption, the Virginia Supreme Court declined to hold that every le...