The Law and Politics of Contemporary Transitional Justice

In this article in the Symposium on Milosevic \u26 Hussein on Trial, the author continues a project of tracing the genealogy of transitional justice in an analysis of the trials of the two Presidents. The author argues that an intellectual genealogy of transitional justice is defined in terms of periods of political change, \u26 the relation of legal development to distinct political phases in world history \u26 various political purposes are contextualized in the history of responses to political conflict. Three historical phases of the genealogy place the trials in Phase III of transitional justice seeking responses associated with post-Cold War global politics. The form of transitional justice in the trials is characterized as an expanded legalism reflecting trends of juridicization \u26 decentralization. Comparative analysis of global transitional justice in the Balkans \u26 Iraq in terms of regime change, the legalist paradigm, expanding international justice, complementarity, \u26 universality contextualize the challenges to normalization of Phase III transitional justice, \u26 the role of spurring normative regime change. The author concludes that the relation of transitional justice to conflict has been altered in the expanded role of the contemporary international law regime. J. Harwel