In Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Department of the Navy, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that the environmental review conducted by the Navy and the National Marine and Fishery Service regarding the proposed construction and operation of a warfare training range was in compliance with federal law. In particular, the court found that segmentation of review at its final stages did not violate the National Environmental Policy Act or the Endangered Species Act. This Comment addresses the danger of allowing a technicality to authorize segmentation of environmental review, and its potential negative impacts on endangered species, such as the North Atlantic right whale. The Eleventh Circuit could have followed the...
The federal government has spent the last thirty years regulating activities that affect endangered ...
In its 1997 decision, Strahan v. Linnon, the United States District Court for the District of Massac...
In Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, the court was...
In Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Department of the Navy, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...
In 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit rejected a challenge to the Nav...
In 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit rejected a challenge to the Nav...
In Metcalf v. Daley, a Congressman, various conservation organizations, and a member of the Makah Tr...
The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently approved the continuing ...
In 2009, Ruby Pipeline, L.L.C. proposed to build a 678-mile pipeline from Wyoming to Oregon that wou...
In Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife the United States Supreme Court reversed the Eighth Circuit and de...
This Article investigates how the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Marine Fisheries Serv...
The final version of this article will appear in the UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, Vol...
Environmental organizations have experienced a string of recent courtroom successes enforcing the fe...
In January 1993, the U.S. Fish & Wild Life Service (“FWS”) added the delta smelt, a small, silvery b...
In Hawaii Longline Ass\u27n v. National Marine Fisheries Service, the Hawaii Longline Association (H...
The federal government has spent the last thirty years regulating activities that affect endangered ...
In its 1997 decision, Strahan v. Linnon, the United States District Court for the District of Massac...
In Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, the court was...
In Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Department of the Navy, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...
In 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit rejected a challenge to the Nav...
In 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit rejected a challenge to the Nav...
In Metcalf v. Daley, a Congressman, various conservation organizations, and a member of the Makah Tr...
The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently approved the continuing ...
In 2009, Ruby Pipeline, L.L.C. proposed to build a 678-mile pipeline from Wyoming to Oregon that wou...
In Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife the United States Supreme Court reversed the Eighth Circuit and de...
This Article investigates how the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Marine Fisheries Serv...
The final version of this article will appear in the UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, Vol...
Environmental organizations have experienced a string of recent courtroom successes enforcing the fe...
In January 1993, the U.S. Fish & Wild Life Service (“FWS”) added the delta smelt, a small, silvery b...
In Hawaii Longline Ass\u27n v. National Marine Fisheries Service, the Hawaii Longline Association (H...
The federal government has spent the last thirty years regulating activities that affect endangered ...
In its 1997 decision, Strahan v. Linnon, the United States District Court for the District of Massac...
In Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, the court was...