This Article provides the first in-depth examination of state-federal concurrent constitutional authority and does so by focusing on a context in which its consequences are most problematic: within individual states. While a handful of articles over the years have examined state court power vis-a-vis federal constitutional questions more generally, no systematic effort has been undertaken to examine intrastate, state-federal conflict on federal constitutional questions. This Article redresses this deficit, using as its doctrinal locus federal constitutional criminal procedure, with its unique impact on government power and individual liberty and privacy
Although the Constitution vests the Judicial Power of the United States in the Supreme Court and i...
In contemporary rights jurisprudence and theory, the Fourteenth Amendment and the Federal Bill of Ri...
Courts and scholars have long sought to illuminate the relationship between state and federal consti...
This Article provides the first in-depth examination of state-federal concurrent constitutional auth...
article published in law reviewFrequently, state-wide executive agencies and localities attempt to i...
Despite their many differences, Americans have long been bound by a shared sense of constitutional c...
Enforcing federalism is most commonly thought to involve the search for a constitutional delegation ...
The question is not what power the federal government ought to have but what powers in fact have bee...
Federal laws that regulate state institutions give rise to what the Supreme Court has described as t...
Scholars have long debated the separation of powers question of what judicial power federal courts h...
This Article focuses on the debate concerning state constitutional expansion of criminal-procedure p...
The lines of authority between states and the federal government are, to a significant extent, defin...
Whether there is parity between federal and state courts has become a central question in the law of...
In Constitutional Home Rule and Judicial Scrutiny, Lynn Baker and Daniel Rodriguez start an importan...
In the American constitutional tradition, federalism is commonly understood as a mechanism designed ...
Although the Constitution vests the Judicial Power of the United States in the Supreme Court and i...
In contemporary rights jurisprudence and theory, the Fourteenth Amendment and the Federal Bill of Ri...
Courts and scholars have long sought to illuminate the relationship between state and federal consti...
This Article provides the first in-depth examination of state-federal concurrent constitutional auth...
article published in law reviewFrequently, state-wide executive agencies and localities attempt to i...
Despite their many differences, Americans have long been bound by a shared sense of constitutional c...
Enforcing federalism is most commonly thought to involve the search for a constitutional delegation ...
The question is not what power the federal government ought to have but what powers in fact have bee...
Federal laws that regulate state institutions give rise to what the Supreme Court has described as t...
Scholars have long debated the separation of powers question of what judicial power federal courts h...
This Article focuses on the debate concerning state constitutional expansion of criminal-procedure p...
The lines of authority between states and the federal government are, to a significant extent, defin...
Whether there is parity between federal and state courts has become a central question in the law of...
In Constitutional Home Rule and Judicial Scrutiny, Lynn Baker and Daniel Rodriguez start an importan...
In the American constitutional tradition, federalism is commonly understood as a mechanism designed ...
Although the Constitution vests the Judicial Power of the United States in the Supreme Court and i...
In contemporary rights jurisprudence and theory, the Fourteenth Amendment and the Federal Bill of Ri...
Courts and scholars have long sought to illuminate the relationship between state and federal consti...