Italy changed its debt contracts, Belize passed new debt legislation, and Taiwan sued Grenada this year, all in response to a string of court rulings in New York that tried to make Argentina pay its debts from its financial crisis in 2001. The court rulings have gone to unprecedented lengths to isolate Argentina but are unlikely to make the country pay. The rulings, however, do threaten collateral damage to other countries and parts of the financial system. The lawsuit—NML Capital Ltd. et al. v. Republic of Argentina—promises to shift the balance of power from sovereign debtors to their creditors. The shift would come courtesy of one obscure debt contract term, the pari passu clause, that has gained destructive power in a case where the gov...
A significant barrier to enforcing sovereign debt obligations in U.S. court has been finding and att...
In the sovereign debt market, the typical remedies to resolve sovereign default are either the negot...
What role did the US courts play in the Argentine debt swap of 2005? What implications does this hav...
Italy changed its debt contracts, Belize passed new debt legislation, and Taiwan sued Grenada this y...
Recent rulings in the ongoing litigation over the pari passu clause in Argentinian sovereign debt in...
The pari passu clause is found in nearly every sovereign debt contract issued throughout the globe. ...
Coined the “trial of the century” in sovereign debt litigation, NML v. Argentina (NML) involves a ra...
Sovereign immunity has served as a partial substitute for bankruptcy protection, but it has encourag...
U.S. federal court rulings against Argentina since 2012 have turned the pari passu clause in soverei...
The decade and a half of litigation that followed Argentina’s sovereign bond default in 2001 ended w...
© Sabine Michalowski 2007. All rights reserved. Sabine Michalowski's work provides a much-needed leg...
Working paper series, paper no. 2016-2Sovereign debt restructurings may experience marginal changes ...
What role did the US courts play in the Argentine debt swap of 2005? What implications does this hav...
In this article I discuss the lessons one can learn from Argentina’s recent debt restructuring and t...
What role did the US courts play in the Argentine debt swap of 2005? What implications does this hav...
A significant barrier to enforcing sovereign debt obligations in U.S. court has been finding and att...
In the sovereign debt market, the typical remedies to resolve sovereign default are either the negot...
What role did the US courts play in the Argentine debt swap of 2005? What implications does this hav...
Italy changed its debt contracts, Belize passed new debt legislation, and Taiwan sued Grenada this y...
Recent rulings in the ongoing litigation over the pari passu clause in Argentinian sovereign debt in...
The pari passu clause is found in nearly every sovereign debt contract issued throughout the globe. ...
Coined the “trial of the century” in sovereign debt litigation, NML v. Argentina (NML) involves a ra...
Sovereign immunity has served as a partial substitute for bankruptcy protection, but it has encourag...
U.S. federal court rulings against Argentina since 2012 have turned the pari passu clause in soverei...
The decade and a half of litigation that followed Argentina’s sovereign bond default in 2001 ended w...
© Sabine Michalowski 2007. All rights reserved. Sabine Michalowski's work provides a much-needed leg...
Working paper series, paper no. 2016-2Sovereign debt restructurings may experience marginal changes ...
What role did the US courts play in the Argentine debt swap of 2005? What implications does this hav...
In this article I discuss the lessons one can learn from Argentina’s recent debt restructuring and t...
What role did the US courts play in the Argentine debt swap of 2005? What implications does this hav...
A significant barrier to enforcing sovereign debt obligations in U.S. court has been finding and att...
In the sovereign debt market, the typical remedies to resolve sovereign default are either the negot...
What role did the US courts play in the Argentine debt swap of 2005? What implications does this hav...