Add to ORKGIn 1932, the Harvard Law Review published a debate between two preeminent corporate scholars on the subject of the proper purpose of the public corporation. On one side stood the renowned Adolph A. Berle, coauthor of the classic The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Berle argued for what is now called shareholder primacy —the view that the corporation exists only to make money for its shareholders. According to Berle, all powers granted to a corporation or to the management of a corporation, or to any group within the corporation. . . [are] at all times exercisable only for the ratable benefit of all the shareholders as their interest appears. On the other side of the debate stood esteemed professor Merrick Dodd of Harvard Law Sch...
Adolf A. Berle is celebrated as the grandfather of modern shareholder primacy, but this glosses over...
By the beginning of the twenty-first century, many observers had come to believe that U.S. corporate...
By the beginning of the twenty-first century, many observers had come to believe that U.S. corporate...
In 1932, the Harvard Law Review published a debate between two preeminent corporate scholars on the ...
In 1932, the Harvard Law Review published a debate between two preeminent corporate scholars on the ...
In 1932, the Harvard Law Review published a debate between two preeminent corporate scholars on the ...
Today, Berle is celebrated as the grandfather of modern shareholder primacy, but this description g...
For decades, those holding the shareholder primacy view that the purpose of a corporation is to earn...
In their 1932 opus The Modern Corporation and Public Property, Adolf Berle and Gardiner Means famo...
Adolf A. Berle is celebrated as the grandfather of modern shareholder primacy, but this glosses over...
By the beginning of the twenty-first century, many observers had come to believe that U.S. corporate...
According to the traditional view, the shareholders own the corporation. Until relatively recently, ...
Adolf A. Berle is celebrated as the grandfather of modern shareholder primacy, but this glosses over...
According to the traditional view, the shareholders own the corporation. Until relatively recently, ...
By the beginning of the twenty-first century, many observers had come to believe that U.S. corporate...
Adolf A. Berle is celebrated as the grandfather of modern shareholder primacy, but this glosses over...
By the beginning of the twenty-first century, many observers had come to believe that U.S. corporate...
By the beginning of the twenty-first century, many observers had come to believe that U.S. corporate...
In 1932, the Harvard Law Review published a debate between two preeminent corporate scholars on the ...
In 1932, the Harvard Law Review published a debate between two preeminent corporate scholars on the ...
In 1932, the Harvard Law Review published a debate between two preeminent corporate scholars on the ...
Today, Berle is celebrated as the grandfather of modern shareholder primacy, but this description g...
For decades, those holding the shareholder primacy view that the purpose of a corporation is to earn...
In their 1932 opus The Modern Corporation and Public Property, Adolf Berle and Gardiner Means famo...
Adolf A. Berle is celebrated as the grandfather of modern shareholder primacy, but this glosses over...
By the beginning of the twenty-first century, many observers had come to believe that U.S. corporate...
According to the traditional view, the shareholders own the corporation. Until relatively recently, ...
Adolf A. Berle is celebrated as the grandfather of modern shareholder primacy, but this glosses over...
According to the traditional view, the shareholders own the corporation. Until relatively recently, ...
By the beginning of the twenty-first century, many observers had come to believe that U.S. corporate...
Adolf A. Berle is celebrated as the grandfather of modern shareholder primacy, but this glosses over...
By the beginning of the twenty-first century, many observers had come to believe that U.S. corporate...
By the beginning of the twenty-first century, many observers had come to believe that U.S. corporate...