The whole of tort law may be envisaged as a process of a protection for one man\u27s interest at the expense of another\u27s according to a norm of social policy. In the law of defamation, as elsewhere, we find a continuous comparison of the social value of the interests involved and the probable effect thereon of license or restraint upon statement and discussion. Immunity is granted or withheld on the principle of the residuum of social convenience deriving from the protection of one interest at the expense of another
This Note will discuss the historical development of the actions of alienation of affection and defa...
When seeking to protect reputation there are different arguments available. The primary route is d...
It is axiomatic that defamation law protects reputation This proposition ”common sensical pervasive ...
The remark has occasionally been made that there is nothing that can accurately be called a law of ...
Underlying the development of the law of defamation is a tension between two broad societal interest...
The right to reputation, at least as far as written defamation is concerned, is recognized as an abs...
The common law of defamation has long been viewed as an intellectual wasteland, perplexed with minu...
Since the 1964 case of New York Times v. Sullivan, the standard for proving defamation has often pro...
Unlike the commonplace statement that defamation law protects reputation, this article suggests that...
The law of defamation seeks to strike an appropriate balance between the right of the plaintiff to b...
Historically, lawyers have been immune from civil liability for statements related to litigation whi...
That there is wide discrepancy between the law and first class ethical principles is the general ass...
That there is a wide discrepancy between the law and first class ethical principles is the general a...
The Supreme Court of Canada decision in Néron v. CBC arguably sets a new low water mark for the prot...
Defamation has traditionally been seen as a tort of strict liability, subject to defences. This art...
This Note will discuss the historical development of the actions of alienation of affection and defa...
When seeking to protect reputation there are different arguments available. The primary route is d...
It is axiomatic that defamation law protects reputation This proposition ”common sensical pervasive ...
The remark has occasionally been made that there is nothing that can accurately be called a law of ...
Underlying the development of the law of defamation is a tension between two broad societal interest...
The right to reputation, at least as far as written defamation is concerned, is recognized as an abs...
The common law of defamation has long been viewed as an intellectual wasteland, perplexed with minu...
Since the 1964 case of New York Times v. Sullivan, the standard for proving defamation has often pro...
Unlike the commonplace statement that defamation law protects reputation, this article suggests that...
The law of defamation seeks to strike an appropriate balance between the right of the plaintiff to b...
Historically, lawyers have been immune from civil liability for statements related to litigation whi...
That there is wide discrepancy between the law and first class ethical principles is the general ass...
That there is a wide discrepancy between the law and first class ethical principles is the general a...
The Supreme Court of Canada decision in Néron v. CBC arguably sets a new low water mark for the prot...
Defamation has traditionally been seen as a tort of strict liability, subject to defences. This art...
This Note will discuss the historical development of the actions of alienation of affection and defa...
When seeking to protect reputation there are different arguments available. The primary route is d...
It is axiomatic that defamation law protects reputation This proposition ”common sensical pervasive ...