Add to ORKGThe plaintiff\u27s complaint in a wrongful death action contained a third count which did not allege due care on the part of plaintiff and decedent; but instead alleged that if there was any negligence on the part of plaintiff or plaintiff\u27s decedent it was less than the negligence of the defendant, Calvin Frelk, when compared
textabstractAbstract: In many jurisdictions, potential injurers are under a legal duty to incorporat...
When a court hearing a negligence action is confronted with evidence of violation of a criminal stat...
In the instant appeal filed by the claimants, it was contended for the appellants that since the vic...
Believing that the holdings and opinions in the case of Maki v. Frelkare significant legal developme...
Consolidation of two actions arising from a multi-vehicle highway accident resulted in verdicts in b...
While anchoring a guy wire for a hay carrier on his farm, plaintiff suffered injuries caused by cont...
Almost immediately after negligence emerged as a distinct tort in the early nineteenth century, the...
In the law and economics literature the notion of negligence has been conceptualized in two dif-fere...
This Note commends the Herskovits court for recognizing the loss of-a-chance claim as a legitimate c...
My first reaction to the performance of the Illinois Appellate Court in Maki v. Frelk was to recall ...
An essential element of the tort of negligence is the duty of care, which is measured by the objecti...
The Texas Supreme Court should take the position that an action for wrongful death is derived from t...
The majority opinion in the Illinois Supreme Court held that if a change was to be made, the task wa...
This Comment examines the elements of causation and valuation in medical malpractice actions where a...
The contributory negligence rule in tort law absolves an injurer from liability if the victim also w...
textabstractAbstract: In many jurisdictions, potential injurers are under a legal duty to incorporat...
When a court hearing a negligence action is confronted with evidence of violation of a criminal stat...
In the instant appeal filed by the claimants, it was contended for the appellants that since the vic...
Believing that the holdings and opinions in the case of Maki v. Frelkare significant legal developme...
Consolidation of two actions arising from a multi-vehicle highway accident resulted in verdicts in b...
While anchoring a guy wire for a hay carrier on his farm, plaintiff suffered injuries caused by cont...
Almost immediately after negligence emerged as a distinct tort in the early nineteenth century, the...
In the law and economics literature the notion of negligence has been conceptualized in two dif-fere...
This Note commends the Herskovits court for recognizing the loss of-a-chance claim as a legitimate c...
My first reaction to the performance of the Illinois Appellate Court in Maki v. Frelk was to recall ...
An essential element of the tort of negligence is the duty of care, which is measured by the objecti...
The Texas Supreme Court should take the position that an action for wrongful death is derived from t...
The majority opinion in the Illinois Supreme Court held that if a change was to be made, the task wa...
This Comment examines the elements of causation and valuation in medical malpractice actions where a...
The contributory negligence rule in tort law absolves an injurer from liability if the victim also w...
textabstractAbstract: In many jurisdictions, potential injurers are under a legal duty to incorporat...
When a court hearing a negligence action is confronted with evidence of violation of a criminal stat...
In the instant appeal filed by the claimants, it was contended for the appellants that since the vic...