Add to ORKGThe Restatement of Torts defines negligence as conduct . . . which falls below the standard established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm. This is the generally accepted view. There is, however, a competing view which has had some vigorous champions. According to it, negligence involves the state of mind of indifference or inadvertence
This is no new subject, yet most of the very able treatment it has received has been written so as g...
Rediscovering the Law of Negligence offers a systematic and theoretical exploration of the law of ne...
In the law and economics literature the notion of negligence has been conceptualized in two dif-fere...
The Restatement of Torts defines negligence as conduct . . . which falls below the standard establi...
The law of negligence holds injurers responsible for the damages they inflict on their victims only ...
If a man has failed to meet the standard of conduct required by law, his conduct may be called negli...
The concept of negligence dominates tort law. Most tort cases are about negligence. Much tort law sc...
The word reasonable and its cognates figure prominently in innumerable areas of the law – from ant...
Duty of care cannot be used anymore as the touchstone to differentiate negligence from strict liabil...
The undertaking to restate the rules and principles developed by theEnglish and American courts find...
Negligence is conduct which falls below the standard established by law for the protection of other...
Traditional learning maintains that liability for negligence is ultimately premised on notions of mo...
Despite the outpouring of interest in tort and criminal theory over the last thirty years, not much ...
Even though it offers a compelling account of the responsibility-component in the negligence standar...
This essay investigates moral and legal responsibility for negligence. Negligence has many meanings;...
This is no new subject, yet most of the very able treatment it has received has been written so as g...
Rediscovering the Law of Negligence offers a systematic and theoretical exploration of the law of ne...
In the law and economics literature the notion of negligence has been conceptualized in two dif-fere...
The Restatement of Torts defines negligence as conduct . . . which falls below the standard establi...
The law of negligence holds injurers responsible for the damages they inflict on their victims only ...
If a man has failed to meet the standard of conduct required by law, his conduct may be called negli...
The concept of negligence dominates tort law. Most tort cases are about negligence. Much tort law sc...
The word reasonable and its cognates figure prominently in innumerable areas of the law – from ant...
Duty of care cannot be used anymore as the touchstone to differentiate negligence from strict liabil...
The undertaking to restate the rules and principles developed by theEnglish and American courts find...
Negligence is conduct which falls below the standard established by law for the protection of other...
Traditional learning maintains that liability for negligence is ultimately premised on notions of mo...
Despite the outpouring of interest in tort and criminal theory over the last thirty years, not much ...
Even though it offers a compelling account of the responsibility-component in the negligence standar...
This essay investigates moral and legal responsibility for negligence. Negligence has many meanings;...
This is no new subject, yet most of the very able treatment it has received has been written so as g...
Rediscovering the Law of Negligence offers a systematic and theoretical exploration of the law of ne...
In the law and economics literature the notion of negligence has been conceptualized in two dif-fere...