This paper addresses the limits placed on access to justice in the context of social services, with a particular, but not exclusive, focus on the United Kingdom, across five central platforms: legal representation, the financial barriers, the structure of the programme, the attitude of the bureaucracy and the personal attributes of the client. The paper finds that there exist, for decades, problematic elements that constitute barriers to justice in this area: the means tested element in the programmes and the bureaucracy’s double role as provider of services and detector of fraud. But to them, in recent years, significant barriers were added: recent cuts in legal aid the imposition of tribunal fees in the UK are retrograde steps, reverting ...
This paper explores the disjuncture in the New Labour Government between the largest reform in fifty...
On 30 July 1949, the Legal Aid and Advice Act was granted royal assent with the intention of ensurin...
This article develops a conceptual framework for access to justice as a ground of judicial review in...
This article addresses the limits placed on access to justice in the context of social services, wit...
Access to justice in England and Wales has been undermined by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishme...
Access to justice was central to the post-war Welfare State but this has been under attack, as part ...
Decades of empirical research have confirmed the prevalence of troublesome situations involving civi...
This chapter draws on four qualitative studies conducted in England from the mid-1990s to 2015, to t...
This is the first academic paper to consider the role that parliamentarians play in access to justic...
Building on a series of ESRC funded seminars, this edited collection of expert papers by academics a...
From the perspective of the legal system, the first decade of democracy has been characterised by th...
This article explores the effect that austerity-oriented public policy has had on access to justice ...
Inaccessibility to justice is a major issue internationally, and in some countries access to justice...
This briefing document has been prepared for the Nuffield Foundation project on ‘Access to Justice f...
Lawyers would argue that this is an epochal moment for access to justice in the UK. Time will judge ...
This paper explores the disjuncture in the New Labour Government between the largest reform in fifty...
On 30 July 1949, the Legal Aid and Advice Act was granted royal assent with the intention of ensurin...
This article develops a conceptual framework for access to justice as a ground of judicial review in...
This article addresses the limits placed on access to justice in the context of social services, wit...
Access to justice in England and Wales has been undermined by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishme...
Access to justice was central to the post-war Welfare State but this has been under attack, as part ...
Decades of empirical research have confirmed the prevalence of troublesome situations involving civi...
This chapter draws on four qualitative studies conducted in England from the mid-1990s to 2015, to t...
This is the first academic paper to consider the role that parliamentarians play in access to justic...
Building on a series of ESRC funded seminars, this edited collection of expert papers by academics a...
From the perspective of the legal system, the first decade of democracy has been characterised by th...
This article explores the effect that austerity-oriented public policy has had on access to justice ...
Inaccessibility to justice is a major issue internationally, and in some countries access to justice...
This briefing document has been prepared for the Nuffield Foundation project on ‘Access to Justice f...
Lawyers would argue that this is an epochal moment for access to justice in the UK. Time will judge ...
This paper explores the disjuncture in the New Labour Government between the largest reform in fifty...
On 30 July 1949, the Legal Aid and Advice Act was granted royal assent with the intention of ensurin...
This article develops a conceptual framework for access to justice as a ground of judicial review in...