When does dependency modelling help? Using a randomized landscape generator to compare algorithms in terms of problem structure

In this paper we extend a previously proposed randomized landscape generator in combination with a comparative experimental methodology to study the behaviour of continuous metaheuristic optimization algorithms. In particular, we generate landscapes with parameterised, linear ridge structure and perform pairwise comparisons of algorithms to gain insight into what kind of problems are easy and difficult for one algorithm instance relative to another. We apply this methodology to investigate the specific issue of explicit dependency modelling in simple continuous Estimation of Distribution Algorithms. Experimental results reveal specific examples of landscapes (with certain identifiable features) where dependency modelling is useful, harmful or has little impact on average algorithm performance. The results are related to some previous intuition about the behaviour of these algorithms, but at the same time lead to new insights into the relationship between dependency modelling in EDAs and the structure of the problem landscape. The overall methodology is quite general and could be used to examine specific features of other algorithms