<p>Relative expression levels standardized to “IN” category are reported, as well as corresponding standard errors. Only genes with significant differences in expression due to age are displayed.</p
<p>1- Data reflect genes significant using a FDR 1% cutoff, for which the mean Control expression ≥6...
<p>Multiple ANOVA results, giving fold changes, showing that mean expression was significantly lower...
<p>The relative gene expression levels as expressed by 2<sup>−△△CT</sup> were determined separately ...
<p>Depending on the status of expression, all spots on the microarray can be divided into 16 categor...
<p>(A) Average log<sub>2</sub> FPKM values over all genes at the 12 ages. (B) Standard deviation of ...
<p>T = treatment with Leuprorelin acetate, VT = vehicle treated, FC = fold change, SEM = standar...
<p>Samples having Cq values (all groups) are presented. The relative gene expression levels of the i...
<p>The relative expression levels of all of the <i>JcNAC</i> genes were the average value of 6 biolo...
<p>Age and sex stratified comparisons of differentially expressed genes, q value <0.05 and fold chan...
<p>The PUFA preferences indicates the preferred substrate for the enzyme, “none” indicates that the ...
Genes (shown in Fig 4) whose expression levels changed significantly in each treatment sample are in...
<p>Statistical significance, corrected for 98 comparisons, taken as p < 0.0005. Nonsignificant value...
<p>Single factor hierarchical clustering of expression profiles; red indicates increased expression,...
<p>Genes whose expression levels were commonly altered among R200#1, R200#8, and R200#11 cells compa...
<p>The significance of the error was determined by obtaining 1,000 randomized cross-validation error...
<p>1- Data reflect genes significant using a FDR 1% cutoff, for which the mean Control expression ≥6...
<p>Multiple ANOVA results, giving fold changes, showing that mean expression was significantly lower...
<p>The relative gene expression levels as expressed by 2<sup>−△△CT</sup> were determined separately ...
<p>Depending on the status of expression, all spots on the microarray can be divided into 16 categor...
<p>(A) Average log<sub>2</sub> FPKM values over all genes at the 12 ages. (B) Standard deviation of ...
<p>T = treatment with Leuprorelin acetate, VT = vehicle treated, FC = fold change, SEM = standar...
<p>Samples having Cq values (all groups) are presented. The relative gene expression levels of the i...
<p>The relative expression levels of all of the <i>JcNAC</i> genes were the average value of 6 biolo...
<p>Age and sex stratified comparisons of differentially expressed genes, q value <0.05 and fold chan...
<p>The PUFA preferences indicates the preferred substrate for the enzyme, “none” indicates that the ...
Genes (shown in Fig 4) whose expression levels changed significantly in each treatment sample are in...
<p>Statistical significance, corrected for 98 comparisons, taken as p < 0.0005. Nonsignificant value...
<p>Single factor hierarchical clustering of expression profiles; red indicates increased expression,...
<p>Genes whose expression levels were commonly altered among R200#1, R200#8, and R200#11 cells compa...
<p>The significance of the error was determined by obtaining 1,000 randomized cross-validation error...
<p>1- Data reflect genes significant using a FDR 1% cutoff, for which the mean Control expression ≥6...
<p>Multiple ANOVA results, giving fold changes, showing that mean expression was significantly lower...
<p>The relative gene expression levels as expressed by 2<sup>−△△CT</sup> were determined separately ...
DOI
Add to ORKG