<p>Correction for the number of comparisons gives a significance level of 0.025. In the last 2 columns confidence intervals for mean differences are shown.</p
<p><i>P</i> values of the between Treatment Post- hoc pairwise comparisons were Holm- Bonferroni adj...
<p>The percentage of correct responses for the (a) T/O task (low cognitive load) and (b) T/L task (h...
<p>A: Stacked difference scores (follow-up compared to session 1) for the five trained tasks for the...
<p>Correction for the number of comparisons gives a significance level of 0.016. In the last 2 colum...
<p>Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. The asterisks indicate the significance level of post hoc compa...
<p>Column 3 is the difference between the observed scores. Column 4 indicates whether the observed d...
<p>Significance levels calculated using Friedman Test (Nonparametric Repeated Measures ANOVA), <i>po...
<p>Mean length-corrected reading times in each block for the RC-First and Filler-First experimental ...
<p>The significance of the differences were evaluated by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post hoc te...
<p>A) and B) shows the perceptual noise for the left/right discrimination of the errors before and ...
<p>Comparison of average accuracy (%) in systematic error correction for short and long duration tas...
<p>Illustrated are the mean proportions of correct responses plotted for each condition and latency ...
<p><b>Top left</b>: Mean reaction time per condition. <b>Top right</b>: Confidence assigned to estim...
<p>Proportion correct averaged across individuals for each degree difference between referent and st...
<p>N.B. All scales have been scored such that higher scores indicate higher levels of the primary co...
<p><i>P</i> values of the between Treatment Post- hoc pairwise comparisons were Holm- Bonferroni adj...
<p>The percentage of correct responses for the (a) T/O task (low cognitive load) and (b) T/L task (h...
<p>A: Stacked difference scores (follow-up compared to session 1) for the five trained tasks for the...
<p>Correction for the number of comparisons gives a significance level of 0.016. In the last 2 colum...
<p>Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. The asterisks indicate the significance level of post hoc compa...
<p>Column 3 is the difference between the observed scores. Column 4 indicates whether the observed d...
<p>Significance levels calculated using Friedman Test (Nonparametric Repeated Measures ANOVA), <i>po...
<p>Mean length-corrected reading times in each block for the RC-First and Filler-First experimental ...
<p>The significance of the differences were evaluated by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post hoc te...
<p>A) and B) shows the perceptual noise for the left/right discrimination of the errors before and ...
<p>Comparison of average accuracy (%) in systematic error correction for short and long duration tas...
<p>Illustrated are the mean proportions of correct responses plotted for each condition and latency ...
<p><b>Top left</b>: Mean reaction time per condition. <b>Top right</b>: Confidence assigned to estim...
<p>Proportion correct averaged across individuals for each degree difference between referent and st...
<p>N.B. All scales have been scored such that higher scores indicate higher levels of the primary co...
<p><i>P</i> values of the between Treatment Post- hoc pairwise comparisons were Holm- Bonferroni adj...
<p>The percentage of correct responses for the (a) T/O task (low cognitive load) and (b) T/L task (h...
<p>A: Stacked difference scores (follow-up compared to session 1) for the five trained tasks for the...