<p>Distribution of weights for hypotheses 4 and 5 for four causal influences. Top row: hypothesis 4; bottom row: hypothesis 5. All histograms are normalized by the total number of occurrences.</p
<p>Each box corresponds to a different proportion of causal variants involved in the relationship be...
<p>Histogram distribution for the samples – (a) Female, (b) Male, (c) 1.5 T and (d) 3 T.</p
<p>Density distribution of Spearman correlations of sample rankings for some normalization methods.<...
<p>Distribution of weights for hypothesis 5 for four causal influences as a function of set size. K ...
<p>The <i>p</i> values that smaller than 0.05 in each column are in bold font.</p><p>The comparison ...
<p>Four possible classes of causal pies for two hypothetical binary risk factors, A and B, in diseas...
<p>Histogram depicting the distribution of the judgments in the zero contingency condition, for the ...
<p>Histograms of distributions of simulated respondents on the latent continuum used in this paper (...
<p>Distributions of simulated regression coefficients (top) and effect sizes (bottom) from the regre...
<p>Histograms of the distribution of publication metrics for individual species a) total number of p...
<p>The histograms show the frequency for the influence factor <i>I</i> recorded in the experiment. P...
<p>In each MAF range, weights were collected from 200 replicates, and weights in each replicate were...
Distribution of mild, moderate, and severe patients, based on the five approaches used in the study....
<p>Weighted Relative influence of countries in G7 sample in Grangers causality based network (HP fil...
<p>Distribution of clinicopathologic characteristics for four categories by the number of examined l...
<p>Each box corresponds to a different proportion of causal variants involved in the relationship be...
<p>Histogram distribution for the samples – (a) Female, (b) Male, (c) 1.5 T and (d) 3 T.</p
<p>Density distribution of Spearman correlations of sample rankings for some normalization methods.<...
<p>Distribution of weights for hypothesis 5 for four causal influences as a function of set size. K ...
<p>The <i>p</i> values that smaller than 0.05 in each column are in bold font.</p><p>The comparison ...
<p>Four possible classes of causal pies for two hypothetical binary risk factors, A and B, in diseas...
<p>Histogram depicting the distribution of the judgments in the zero contingency condition, for the ...
<p>Histograms of distributions of simulated respondents on the latent continuum used in this paper (...
<p>Distributions of simulated regression coefficients (top) and effect sizes (bottom) from the regre...
<p>Histograms of the distribution of publication metrics for individual species a) total number of p...
<p>The histograms show the frequency for the influence factor <i>I</i> recorded in the experiment. P...
<p>In each MAF range, weights were collected from 200 replicates, and weights in each replicate were...
Distribution of mild, moderate, and severe patients, based on the five approaches used in the study....
<p>Weighted Relative influence of countries in G7 sample in Grangers causality based network (HP fil...
<p>Distribution of clinicopathologic characteristics for four categories by the number of examined l...
<p>Each box corresponds to a different proportion of causal variants involved in the relationship be...
<p>Histogram distribution for the samples – (a) Female, (b) Male, (c) 1.5 T and (d) 3 T.</p
<p>Density distribution of Spearman correlations of sample rankings for some normalization methods.<...
DOI
Add to ORKG