<p>Figure 1a stills from the videos of experiment 1 showing the 2×2 factorial design collapsed across the factors goal and eye gaze direction. The factors depicted here are hand moved and the head position. Figure 1b shows the time course of a typical trial.</p
<p>Each trial began with a one sentence reminder of each target to be viewed in that given trial. A ...
<p>Each screen consisted of a pair of pictures presented side by side for 3 seconds during encoding ...
<p>a) The experiment consisted of three parts. Before scanning, two examples were given to participa...
<p>Figure 4a stills from the videos of experiment 2 showing the 2×2 factorial design collapsed acros...
<p>(A,B) Apparatus. (C) Two eye-movement conditions. Each participant placed their chin on a support...
<p>(a) Shows an example of the sequence of rivalry and fusion periods during the attend-to-grating a...
<p>The experimental session involved 240 trials of intermixed prosaccadic (A), antisaccadic (B) and ...
<p>Experimental design showing the different interventions and points of measurement.</p
<p>The task consisted of 110 trials (22 neutral and 88 negative). A single trial lasted 15,5 seconds...
<p>(A) Trial timeline. Each trial started with a 1 second baseline period (pre-cue period), after wh...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic view of a trial progression during the eye-gaze contingent paradigm used in ...
<p>Shown are the elements of a single trial and their corresponding durations (here exemplary for ad...
<p>All the subjects took place in the current study, were exposed to these four different tasks name...
<p>Top of the figure: The male (right) and female (left) face with a straight ahead gaze, a gaze to ...
<p><b>A</b> One-response design. Participants indicated their decision and their confidence simultan...
<p>Each trial began with a one sentence reminder of each target to be viewed in that given trial. A ...
<p>Each screen consisted of a pair of pictures presented side by side for 3 seconds during encoding ...
<p>a) The experiment consisted of three parts. Before scanning, two examples were given to participa...
<p>Figure 4a stills from the videos of experiment 2 showing the 2×2 factorial design collapsed acros...
<p>(A,B) Apparatus. (C) Two eye-movement conditions. Each participant placed their chin on a support...
<p>(a) Shows an example of the sequence of rivalry and fusion periods during the attend-to-grating a...
<p>The experimental session involved 240 trials of intermixed prosaccadic (A), antisaccadic (B) and ...
<p>Experimental design showing the different interventions and points of measurement.</p
<p>The task consisted of 110 trials (22 neutral and 88 negative). A single trial lasted 15,5 seconds...
<p>(A) Trial timeline. Each trial started with a 1 second baseline period (pre-cue period), after wh...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic view of a trial progression during the eye-gaze contingent paradigm used in ...
<p>Shown are the elements of a single trial and their corresponding durations (here exemplary for ad...
<p>All the subjects took place in the current study, were exposed to these four different tasks name...
<p>Top of the figure: The male (right) and female (left) face with a straight ahead gaze, a gaze to ...
<p><b>A</b> One-response design. Participants indicated their decision and their confidence simultan...
<p>Each trial began with a one sentence reminder of each target to be viewed in that given trial. A ...
<p>Each screen consisted of a pair of pictures presented side by side for 3 seconds during encoding ...
<p>a) The experiment consisted of three parts. Before scanning, two examples were given to participa...
DOI
Add to ORKG