<p>Tests, subjects conducted tests before and after training in which they reported the direction of motion coherence by selecting an arrow with a computer mouse. Training, a given trial was from one of three conditions; in the exact-target condition the targets were always the same for a given subject (here <3 2>), in the target-present trials the targets could be any number combination other than that presented in the exact-target condition, and in the target-absent condition no target was presented were to respond . Red arrows indicate direction of coherence; a different direction of motion coherences was paired with each trial type.</p
<p>The experimental session involved 240 trials of intermixed prosaccadic (A), antisaccadic (B) and ...
<p>Human observers performed a direction discrimination task and reported the rotational direction c...
<p>(A) Experimental conditions and associated stimuli. S1 and S2 arrow stimuli are shown followed by...
<p>(A) Motion discrimination task. Trials started with the onset of a central fixation dot. After 50...
<div><p>For each group a direction discrimination test was performed before and after 9 days of trai...
<p>On each trial, the observer was required to discriminate the direction (upward or downward) of th...
<p>(A) Example of one trial. (B) Distribution of the directions of motion for each condition (if the...
<p><b>a)</b> Subjects’ lateral movements (red arrows) controlled the lateral position of a real-time...
<p>Participants were instructed to direct the moving dot into the square as quickly as possible by p...
<p>Each trial consisted of a dot motion coherence stimulus displayed for 220 to 3500 milliseconds, w...
<p><b>A.</b> Schematic of experimental display. A dot follows a circular arc trajectory towards the ...
<p>A. Example of arrow stimuli, noise (stimulus-absent) and task questions. The questions presented ...
<p>The stimuli (target and flankers) in each type of trial in the incongruent and congruent directio...
<p>In the Stroop experiments (experiments 1 and 2), participants were instructed to manually indicat...
(A) Trial sequences were presented where certain motion directions were more common, with unpredicta...
<p>The experimental session involved 240 trials of intermixed prosaccadic (A), antisaccadic (B) and ...
<p>Human observers performed a direction discrimination task and reported the rotational direction c...
<p>(A) Experimental conditions and associated stimuli. S1 and S2 arrow stimuli are shown followed by...
<p>(A) Motion discrimination task. Trials started with the onset of a central fixation dot. After 50...
<div><p>For each group a direction discrimination test was performed before and after 9 days of trai...
<p>On each trial, the observer was required to discriminate the direction (upward or downward) of th...
<p>(A) Example of one trial. (B) Distribution of the directions of motion for each condition (if the...
<p><b>a)</b> Subjects’ lateral movements (red arrows) controlled the lateral position of a real-time...
<p>Participants were instructed to direct the moving dot into the square as quickly as possible by p...
<p>Each trial consisted of a dot motion coherence stimulus displayed for 220 to 3500 milliseconds, w...
<p><b>A.</b> Schematic of experimental display. A dot follows a circular arc trajectory towards the ...
<p>A. Example of arrow stimuli, noise (stimulus-absent) and task questions. The questions presented ...
<p>The stimuli (target and flankers) in each type of trial in the incongruent and congruent directio...
<p>In the Stroop experiments (experiments 1 and 2), participants were instructed to manually indicat...
(A) Trial sequences were presented where certain motion directions were more common, with unpredicta...
<p>The experimental session involved 240 trials of intermixed prosaccadic (A), antisaccadic (B) and ...
<p>Human observers performed a direction discrimination task and reported the rotational direction c...
<p>(A) Experimental conditions and associated stimuli. S1 and S2 arrow stimuli are shown followed by...